From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7833C0619 for ; Thu, 7 May 2026 09:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778145703; cv=none; b=pk4jdGaAzC6jL0ez4Q9jNzAKONeAbXCwQh5rRfgmXQnQMq27A018ifXH+qV2sEPAoA61NWnUhQzx1SEo9RAsrZFUvRS3meU83QgQcajxMXbiE+l9KZxfS7H1xUCkPQ5yW5040nr6SD05OjmtXeEqg1iXxUw8zfL6Tjy7eHNko7Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778145703; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WxBCtqpKKW7waaUP8Vrq5Hqx5TZRDhnRcpzXY8zIYrs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XlsWnzLjVwD8HvgWbsZDYqTBP7mGc6bcPkpiqjNcBk87JU4pSljMFGnIx7/rEPGN8pJD5njUmBkelb9DzoscXQgTxr6CuDODXww+SQHR9Q01DVNeGiXiYDiLCnhevihjX+53oxbFWmQlzld8TjF3WlKeYbbXxxuf+Ve72JRpQWc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=Sr92jJCq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Sr92jJCq" Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48d1c670255so77555e9.0 for ; Thu, 07 May 2026 02:21:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1778145694; x=1778750494; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lZOdgNov1BxqyJ4K4hjZNDZI6MstUmVOQY9xgpKGQf0=; b=Sr92jJCqd7yuc5TDPOXG9/yG5eu3pZESImndFkRquluTsqagV3uM+AK/3eiuH4tSgK ELtYzvxHmrLicEJKRhGtORhW09xSLUbZnjZ5iiCfLFRDgK5/tctQIerNYxUETZFmOdPw mq99hchWIOLqDagMCUOxbWB+yvuD/N8ap/L6lqzohb5BDrx6DTEkoQQYMSPx7fl6HI9A 2HhvF4lUdqCcsHrbrXPRITI7OCVrwTgQP5ZaBy02PCFuiOKifYKcQNy32coUteWswmA3 e1+BaJ8brpCFHWt49CzEbe36sY2kDgg7IjRK+ly+VKphhNuXFUieUhnR4TnbPDoMAzvS ulyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778145694; x=1778750494; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lZOdgNov1BxqyJ4K4hjZNDZI6MstUmVOQY9xgpKGQf0=; b=EFxtkk5XSXfZ5MzJwwzgSjqj/MsTaP9Byj3bXZERc06P8rKdFKBgZrZJ3OXfWjpdlC D1N8LFQv3SGmqC4LqxwjaQe2UbDiISk2rKfUMmgXXR4pEoG3zY6IEBU8WV0d0FjGhH3N EZ41ZM01V4ivrIkZgteyQkhIRZf1MlHDcFWFXfJ8S9MtSR2JK/AGOUO4IJT5mOtmC/zf zJZob2C3lRk3leSv0awsKCBDWBpOAA/SyDee5XOYmoCixnnE+VCl9S4mPXVKpur6Y1w9 8kUJc9nx9prnoG4XwhA1xSRUPfq3n1mZii7vDYI7zhfEW6Zq4EedccRarOmd2PT/72l8 RNQg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9rLz5QLM//ZEUv8ibViH/LJi1BU+u4g6IltdnCBulWeNVC2mSgSZhxPbtkcT82IUY2OYBYgJ52@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzkW+72wdoZ/BfvAMIMXLOSixxD6P4qilyInLDvxX5LrHwc6mSa 6JSjKsgLo1Zx/SZw0F1/JP9Wcfo7b/I3Y/45CrbhhV5ZsorStaMz60NjW6gUW8PM+A== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiet0EcOJBpCsyBHMAL9oTOHxDU0qgCbsog/QzPSCm/E4WKsWy+DnXUian3uYqdp 6AX1w1vGydp2IsZ75nH1ZaYRN8vGz6dPA0GNmoP0O6evKKZfRGLSAEiv5PNY6dMTcj9e54A3PMk HpfdsWH3yB8HY2V7F9iQ7MZ0LBgvsCsl/D4HCE/5W/9smxNxql14VzmJJ+/lIOTUj1JnUnhSx1j GUxnufFPoZEaNk6eprZZ4lVdvKnDhROr6+wGg7cD+am0N4Jp+Ck+/B17+i/X0RHJlu56VFOaiS1 0yD9ESN3ZgZgy5YE9NheL2yxUMEJWQKWJO+S6r6T39gYw6NjJCphpJi8GY1zE00N8wWHBsBBdFp hxc/0l5JI4sDwlw0MTSfKQCtCFFtgNHVml9iwAz2LU1oGya8BcIU519DI0I5yWsVpt3mfUfiZjr cey6HZVd/+sx/euh9Vl/zs3yN209ccCU97S/mJspa/YEB1NfEFslcdHQYQKmxJGhK3jS/JRPANY d2lnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2284:b0:488:960f:60b8 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48e5d64bc85mr779165e9.6.1778145693237; Thu, 07 May 2026 02:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (8.181.38.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.38.181.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-453509db3ccsm2354347f8f.36.2026.05.07.02.21.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 May 2026 02:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 09:21:28 +0000 From: Mostafa Saleh To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jonathan Hunter , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy , Thierry Reding , Krishna Reddy , Will Deacon , David Matlack , Pasha Tatashin , patches@lists.linux.dev, Samiullah Khawaja Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the HW arm_smmu_cmd in cmdq selection functions Message-ID: References: <0-v1-b7dc0a0d4aa0+3723d-smmu_no_cmdq_ent_jgg@nvidia.com> <2-v1-b7dc0a0d4aa0+3723d-smmu_no_cmdq_ent_jgg@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2-v1-b7dc0a0d4aa0+3723d-smmu_no_cmdq_ent_jgg@nvidia.com> On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 11:29:11AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Start removing the use of struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent, starting at the > lower levels of the call chain. Change the functions that determine what > cmdq to issue the batch to into using struct arm_smmu_cmd directly. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe > --- > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 47 ++++++++++++------- > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 8 ++-- > .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/tegra241-cmdqv.c | 8 ++-- > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > index e8d7dbe495f030..5cdeaec890592f 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > @@ -371,12 +371,12 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) > } > > static struct arm_smmu_cmdq *arm_smmu_get_cmdq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > - struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) > + struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd) > { > struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = NULL; > > if (smmu->impl_ops && smmu->impl_ops->get_secondary_cmdq) > - cmdq = smmu->impl_ops->get_secondary_cmdq(smmu, ent); > + cmdq = smmu->impl_ops->get_secondary_cmdq(smmu, cmd); > > return cmdq ?: &smmu->cmdq; > } > @@ -924,16 +924,16 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent, > bool sync) > { > - u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS]; > + struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd; > > - if (unlikely(arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, ent))) { > + if (unlikely(arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, ent))) { > dev_warn(smmu->dev, "ignoring unknown CMDQ opcode 0x%x\n", > ent->opcode); > return -EINVAL; > } > > return arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist( > - smmu, arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu, ent), cmd, 1, sync); > + smmu, arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu, &cmd), cmd.data, 1, sync); > } > > static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > @@ -948,42 +948,55 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > return __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, ent, true); > } > > +static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > + struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds, > + struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd) > +{ > + cmds->num = 0; > + cmds->cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu, cmd); > +} > + > static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds, > struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) > { > - cmds->num = 0; > - cmds->cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu, ent); > + struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd; > + > + arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, ent); > + arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init_cmd(smmu, cmds, &cmd); > } > > static void arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_add(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch *cmds, > - struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *cmd) > + struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) > { > - bool unsupported_cmd = !arm_smmu_cmdq_supports_cmd(cmds->cmdq, cmd); > bool force_sync = (cmds->num == CMDQ_BATCH_ENTRIES - 1) && > (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_CMDQ_FORCE_SYNC); > + struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd; > + bool unsupported_cmd; > int index; > > + if (unlikely(arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd.data, ent))) { > + dev_warn(smmu->dev, "ignoring unknown CMDQ opcode 0x%x\n", > + ent->opcode); > + return; > + } > + > + unsupported_cmd = !arm_smmu_cmdq_supports_cmd(cmds->cmdq, &cmd); > if (force_sync || unsupported_cmd) { > arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, cmds->cmdq, cmds->cmds, > cmds->num, true); > - arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init(smmu, cmds, cmd); > + arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init_cmd(smmu, cmds, &cmd); > } > > if (cmds->num == CMDQ_BATCH_ENTRIES) { > arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(smmu, cmds->cmdq, cmds->cmds, > cmds->num, false); > - arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init(smmu, cmds, cmd); > + arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init_cmd(smmu, cmds, &cmd); > } > > index = cmds->num * CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS; > - if (unlikely(arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(&cmds->cmds[index], cmd))) { > - dev_warn(smmu->dev, "ignoring unknown CMDQ opcode 0x%x\n", > - cmd->opcode); > - return; > - } > - > + memcpy(&cmds->cmds[index], cmd.data, sizeof(cmd.data)); Maybe this would be better squashed with other arm_smmu_cmdq_batch patch to avoid this memcpy, but no strong opinion. Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh Thanks, Mostafa > cmds->num++; > } > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h > index 092179f689e9f1..6d73f6b63e64a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h > @@ -641,13 +641,13 @@ struct arm_smmu_cmdq { > atomic_long_t *valid_map; > atomic_t owner_prod; > atomic_t lock; > - bool (*supports_cmd)(struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent); > + bool (*supports_cmd)(struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd); > }; > > static inline bool arm_smmu_cmdq_supports_cmd(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq, > - struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) > + struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd) > { > - return cmdq->supports_cmd ? cmdq->supports_cmd(ent) : true; > + return cmdq->supports_cmd ? cmdq->supports_cmd(cmd) : true; > } > > struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch { > @@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl_ops { > void (*device_remove)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu); > int (*init_structures)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu); > struct arm_smmu_cmdq *(*get_secondary_cmdq)( > - struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent); > + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd); > /* > * An implementation should define its own type other than the default > * IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3. And it must validate the input @type > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/tegra241-cmdqv.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/tegra241-cmdqv.c > index 83f6e9f6c51d6b..b4d8c1f2fd3878 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/tegra241-cmdqv.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/tegra241-cmdqv.c > @@ -367,9 +367,9 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra241_cmdqv_isr(int irq, void *devid) > > /* Command Queue Function */ > > -static bool tegra241_guest_vcmdq_supports_cmd(struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) > +static bool tegra241_guest_vcmdq_supports_cmd(struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd) > { > - switch (ent->opcode) { > + switch (FIELD_GET(CMDQ_0_OP, cmd->data[0])) { > case CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NH_ASID: > case CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NH_VA: > case CMDQ_OP_ATC_INV: > @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static bool tegra241_guest_vcmdq_supports_cmd(struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) > > static struct arm_smmu_cmdq * > tegra241_cmdqv_get_cmdq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > - struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) > + struct arm_smmu_cmd *cmd) > { > struct tegra241_cmdqv *cmdqv = > container_of(smmu, struct tegra241_cmdqv, smmu); > @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ tegra241_cmdqv_get_cmdq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > return NULL; > > /* Unsupported CMD goes for smmu->cmdq pathway */ > - if (!arm_smmu_cmdq_supports_cmd(&vcmdq->cmdq, ent)) > + if (!arm_smmu_cmdq_supports_cmd(&vcmdq->cmdq, cmd)) > return NULL; > return &vcmdq->cmdq; > } > -- > 2.43.0 >