From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f173.google.com (mail-pf1-f173.google.com [209.85.210.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9065829D0F for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hg3y0MmQ" Received: by mail-pf1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6c115026985so4885118b3a.1 for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:43:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699292583; x=1699897383; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CXH5ahRPz8knk5h9KfR4IuZwTMLTaHWDUAgFgEvqapQ=; b=hg3y0MmQk+4lTE4bhhJa5doCUPjn6JDGHcUJwx8PXqfBCXFGgPTtLDHiX7Y4JaXt2J e+HyMmxKyuWmIN6ub1x4qJPN4ddm+r/e6tOvDUh7bfJltdeWckL/UyIMe56GbP9gxSgu UqQ12Q/b4csCBC/3JEi6zGMZJFVetkp6YE5uo8uYnb5rhMmSvHFrWGOYMOgZgwoFoHyl /eaz0bkGlNaSLO8BsV8hLxIJdVfGPHly6doFk3Cn88gLwUVhxigY8Jei1p/I4uu6Fc4Z 6tQ45Eli2p+DpUhACfwbbwbTuro3U717xxUqgdvcGZQQh8nz5NLqMHZ2ovpX5Rx/hMjS ruKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699292583; x=1699897383; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CXH5ahRPz8knk5h9KfR4IuZwTMLTaHWDUAgFgEvqapQ=; b=nH6wNJWDwS4mk09aO6vj7QgavvUgaGMuE73eCobWBq6UN651KRn9SfKfWZDEIQHG3s NfwfmQoLmAS+ssvhj2Ks0Dsu/LmewBsytffGbnlxusCN77C7JR3eSTDfRtJ5dHsOfHEI noDmVkYDb+QH581Iw9GKpg6dS/C+YsqQsAduVcDPBU/oji20u/N/eC23RE5rzIEtOEAA GYpKceeQiX1qgxt9XlKXbJZ+PadbY2r/vI+eEpCY+RZJJtzP78GA6TsGy+ywRdPcm3/n ME5onc7S/nEEafdwDTR9UtC9j/NrChhwyEXNtuVEvnn/MY4hLOsNjSosuPXzv6j24d4w SCiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxsC+KOccutx71yqrQBLKxAJfoiVZ2SsU1SnrX1iX/LHCHBwsvQ nupFxgQD3MJWTp/xczXmpnY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGdwlguaisgUp5xLqOca+yiZGMYX7D1ugesp5ymFRkqq5g+jSkbzdQHAeC4eV9GmySDDqEaYg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:ae25:b0:16b:bd0f:ad0d with SMTP id dp37-20020a056a20ae2500b0016bbd0fad0dmr21552292pzb.28.1699292582698; Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:43:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.67.48.245] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 14-20020a17090a01ce00b00273744e6eccsm6319954pjd.12.2023.11.06.09.43.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:43:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:42:59 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Content-Language: en-US To: Allen Pais , Harshit Mogalapalli Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , mizhang@google.com, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, Vegard Nossum , Darren Kenny References: <20231106130309.112650042@linuxfoundation.org> <2665d8bc-111c-45ca-a473-b1c892867e9c@oracle.com> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/6/23 09:08, Allen Pais wrote: >> >> On 06/11/23 6:32 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release. >>> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >> >> I am seeing a build failure with perf: >> >> tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function evlist__add_aux_dummy: >> tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:31: error: implicit declaration of function >> evlist__dummy_event; did you mean evlist__add_sb_event’? >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 266 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist); >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> | evlist__add_sb_event >> >> >> I think we should drop these three commits: >> >> 20a5799cae7dc perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event >> 7de783c81c7e7 perf tools: Get rid of evlist__add_on_all_cpus() >> 141ce9207068e perf evlist: Add evlist__add_dummy_on_all_cpus() >> >> Backport was requested here: >> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAL715WLTjMGQrhm6wWqFSeL_Oq-HzoQd5CqewvLRLv0Xbnibgw@mail.gmail.com/ >> > > > Just tested perf build, I see the same errors: > > tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function 'evlist__add_aux_dummy': > /linux/tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:24: error: implicit declaration of > function 'evlist__dummy_event'; did you mean 'evlist__add_sb_event'? > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > evlist__add_sb_event > linux/tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:24: error: initialization makes > pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion] Yep, same here (and on 5.10 as well). -- Florian