patches.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 19/20] x86/resctrl: Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) detection and enabling
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 13:28:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6651270-25a3-4d9e-91f8-4aa9c8652b98@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528222006.58283-20-tony.luck@intel.com>

Hi Tony,

should "and enabling" be dropped from shortlog?

On 5/28/24 3:20 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> There isn't a simple hardware bit that indicates whether a CPU is
> running in Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode. Infer the state by comparing
> number CPUs sharing the L3 cache with CPU0 to the number of CPUs in
> the same NUMA node as CPU0.
> 
> If SNC mode is detected, print a single informational message to the
> console.
> 
> Add the missing definition of pr_fmt() to monitor.c. This wasn't
> noticed before as there are only "can't happen" console messages
> from this file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index c7559735e33a..1c5162a68461 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>    * Software Developer Manual June 2016, volume 3, section 17.17.
>    */
>   
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"resctrl: " fmt
> +
>   #include <linux/cpu.h>
>   #include <linux/module.h>
>   #include <linux/sizes.h>
> @@ -1095,6 +1097,61 @@ void arch_mon_domain_online(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d)
>   	wrmsrl(MSR_RMID_SNC_CONFIG, val);
>   }
>   
> +/* CPU models that support MSR_RMID_SNC_CONFIG */
> +static const struct x86_cpu_id snc_cpu_ids[] __initconst = {
> +	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ICELAKE_X, 0),
> +	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_SAPPHIRERAPIDS_X, 0),
> +	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_EMERALDRAPIDS_X, 0),
> +	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_GRANITERAPIDS_X, 0),
> +	X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ATOM_CRESTMONT_X, 0),
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * There isn't a simple hardware bit that indicates whether a CPU is running
> + * in Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode. Infer the state by comparing the
> + * number CPUs sharing the L3 cache with CPU0 to the number of CPUs in
> + * the same NUMA node as CPU0.
> + * It is not possible to accurately determine SNC state if the system is
> + * booted with a maxcpus=N parameter. That distorts the ratio of SNC nodes
> + * to L3 caches. It will be OK if system is booted with hyperthreading
> + * disabled (since this doesn't affect the ratio).
> + */
> +static __init int snc_get_config(void)
> +{
> +	struct cacheinfo *ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(0, RESCTRL_L3_CACHE);
> +	const cpumask_t	*node0_cpumask;

Stray tab

> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!x86_match_cpu(snc_cpu_ids) || !ci)
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	cpus_read_lock();
> +	if (num_online_cpus() != num_present_cpus())
> +		pr_warn("Some CPUs offline, SNC detection may be incorrect\n");
> +	cpus_read_unlock();
> +
> +	node0_cpumask = cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(0));
> +
> +	ret = cpumask_weight(&ci->shared_cpu_map) / cpumask_weight(node0_cpumask);

It is not obvious to the static checker I tried that cpumask_weight(node0_cpumask)
cannot be zero. Can you please insert a check to make static checkers happy?

> +
> +	/* sanity check: Only valid results are 1, 2, 3, 4 */
> +	switch (ret) {
> +	case 1:
> +		break;
> +	case 2 ... 4:
> +		pr_info("Sub-NUMA Cluster mode detected with %d nodes per L3 cache\n", ret);
> +		rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl.mon_scope = RESCTRL_L3_NODE;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		pr_warn("Ignore improbable SNC node count %d\n", ret);
> +		ret = 1;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   int __init rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
>   {
>   	unsigned int mbm_offset = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_mbm_width_offset;
> @@ -1102,6 +1159,8 @@ int __init rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
>   	unsigned int threshold;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	snc_nodes_per_l3_cache = snc_get_config();
> +
>   	resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_size * 1024;
>   	hw_res->mon_scale = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_occ_scale / snc_nodes_per_l3_cache;
>   	r->num_rmid = (boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_max_rmid + 1) / snc_nodes_per_l3_cache;

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-30 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-28 22:19 [PATCH v19 00/20] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 01/20] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new domain scope Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 02/20] x86/resctrl: Prepare to split rdt_domain structure Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 03/20] x86/resctrl: Prepare for different scope for control/monitor operations Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 04/20] x86/resctrl: Split the rdt_domain and rdt_hw_domain structures Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 05/20] x86/resctrl: Add node-scope to the options for feature scope Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 06/20] x86/resctrl: Introduce snc_nodes_per_l3_cache Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:20   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-31 18:17     ` Tony Luck
2024-06-07 16:49       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 07/20] x86/resctrl: Block use of mba_MBps mount option on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 08/20] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-31  0:26     ` Tony Luck
2024-05-31 16:01       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 09/20] x86/resctrl: Add new fields to struct rmid_read for summation of domains Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 10/20] x86/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir() with a helper function Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 11/20] x86/resctrl: Allocate a new bit in union mon_data_bits Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 12/20] x86/resctrl: Create Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:22   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 13/20] x86/resctrl: Handle removing directories in Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:19 ` [PATCH v19 14/20] x86/resctrl: Fill out rmid_read structure for smp_call*() to read a counter Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 15/20] x86/resctrl: Pass two extra arguments to resctrl_arch_rmid_read() Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:24   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 16/20] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() handle sum over domains Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:24   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-03 23:15     ` Tony Luck
2024-06-07 16:49       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-07 19:51         ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-07 21:08           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 17/20] x86/resctrl: Update CPU sanity checks when reading RMID counters Tony Luck
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 18/20] x86/resctrl: Enable RMID shared RMID mode on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:27   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 19/20] x86/resctrl: Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) detection and enabling Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:28   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-05-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v19 20/20] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA cluster changes Tony Luck
2024-05-30 20:29   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-28 22:55 ` [PATCH v19 00/20] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Reinette Chatre
2024-05-29 20:20   ` Tony Luck
2024-05-30  2:46     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-30 16:36       ` Tony Luck
2024-05-30 17:55         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-30 22:49           ` Luck, Tony
2024-05-30 23:10             ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c6651270-25a3-4d9e-91f8-4aa9c8652b98@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).