From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <shuah@kernel.org>, <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<tony.luck@intel.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<fenghuay@nvidia.com>, <peternewman@google.com>,
<zide.chen@intel.com>, <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
<ben.horgan@arm.com>, <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] selftests/resctrl: Support multiple events associated with iMC
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 11:25:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c69d8068-852e-4029-b079-52fd0a9380ec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0536a31-a8da-2232-67ca-91c60eb714c2@linux.intel.com>
Hi Ilpo,
On 3/6/26 2:18 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2026, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>
>> The resctrl selftests discover needed parameters to perf_event_open() via
>> sysfs. The PMU associated with every memory controller (iMC) is discovered
>> via the /sys/bus/event_source/devices/uncore_imc_N/type file while
>> the read memory bandwidth event type and umask is discovered via
>> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/uncore_imc_N/events/cas_count_read.
>>
>> Newer systems may have multiple events that expose read memory bandwidth.
>> For example,
>> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/uncore_imc_N/events/cas_count_read_sch0
>> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/uncore_imc_N/events/cas_count_read_sch1
>>
>> Support parsing of iMC PMU properties when the PMU may have multiple events
>> to measure read memory bandwidth. The PMU only needs to be discovered once.
>> Split the parsing of event details from actual PMU discovery in order to
>> loop over all events associated with the PMU. Match all events with the
>> cas_count_read prefix instead of requiring there to be one file with that
>> name.
>>
>> Make the parsing code more robust. With strings passed around to create
>> needed paths, use snprintf() instead of sprintf() to ensure there is
>> always enough space to create the path. Ensure there is enough room in
>> imc_counters_config[] before attempting to add an entry.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Add Zide Chen's RB tag.
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 112 ++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
>> index 25c8101631e0..7aae0cc5aee9 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
>> @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
>> #include "resctrl.h"
>>
>> #define UNCORE_IMC "uncore_imc"
>> -#define READ_FILE_NAME "events/cas_count_read"
>> +#define READ_FILE_NAME "cas_count_read"
>> #define DYN_PMU_PATH "/sys/bus/event_source/devices"
>> #define SCALE 0.00006103515625
>> -#define MAX_IMCS 20
>> +#define MAX_IMCS 40
>> #define MAX_TOKENS 5
>>
>> #define CON_MBM_LOCAL_BYTES_PATH \
>> @@ -109,21 +109,102 @@ static int open_perf_read_event(int i, int cpu_no)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int parse_imc_read_bw_events(char *imc_dir, unsigned int type,
>> + unsigned int *count)
>> +{
>> + char imc_events[1024], imc_counter_cfg[1024], cas_count_cfg[1024];
>
> The first two are paths, right? PATH_MAX should be used instead of the
> literals.
Yes, they are paths. Thanks. Will use PATH_MAX.
>
>> + unsigned int org_count = *count;
>
> orig_count is less ambiguous name.
Sure.
>
>> + struct dirent *ep;
>> + int path_len;
>> + int ret = -1;
>> + FILE *fp;
>> + DIR *dp;
>> +
>> + path_len = snprintf(imc_events, sizeof(imc_events), "%sevents", imc_dir);
>> + if (path_len >= sizeof(imc_events)) {
>> + ksft_print_msg("Unable to create path to %sevents\n", imc_dir);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> + dp = opendir(imc_events);
>> + if (dp) {
>> + while ((ep = readdir(dp))) {
>> + /*
>> + * Parse all event files with READ_FILE_NAME
>> + * prefix that contain the event number and umask.
>> + * Skip files containing "." that contain unused
>> + * properties of event.
>> + */
>> + if (!strstr(ep->d_name, READ_FILE_NAME) ||
>> + strchr(ep->d_name, '.'))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + path_len = snprintf(imc_counter_cfg, sizeof(imc_counter_cfg),
>> + "%s/%s", imc_events, ep->d_name);
>> + if (path_len >= sizeof(imc_counter_cfg)) {
>> + ksft_print_msg("Unable to create path to %s/%s\n",
>> + imc_events, ep->d_name);
>> + goto out_close;
>> + }
>> + fp = fopen(imc_counter_cfg, "r");
>> + if (!fp) {
>> + ksft_perror("Failed to open iMC config file");
>> + goto out_close;
>> + }
>> + if (fscanf(fp, "%1023s", cas_count_cfg) <= 0) {
>> + ksft_perror("Could not get iMC cas count read");
>> + fclose(fp);
>> + goto out_close;
>> + }
>> + fclose(fp);
>
> I'd prefer:
>
> xx = fscanf(...);
> fclose(fp);
> if (xx) {
> ...
>
> ...But it is up to you ("ret" cannot be used as xx as is).
ok. I do not really like to use ret for xx since it generates a bit of churn to
reset on success as well as failure paths after the fscanf(). I can introduce a new
local variable that should help with readability.
>
>> + if (*count >= MAX_IMCS) {
>> + ksft_print_msg("Maximum iMC count exceeded\n");
>> + goto out_close;
>> + }
>> +
>> + imc_counters_config[*count].type = type;
>> + get_read_event_and_umask(cas_count_cfg, *count);
>> + /* Do not fail after incrementing *count. */
>> + *count += 1;
>> + }
>> + if (*count == org_count) {
>> + ksft_print_msg("Unable to find events in %s\n", imc_events);
>> + goto out_close;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + ksft_perror("Unable to open PMU events directory");
>> + goto out;
>
> Reverse the logic (handle error first), it reduces the indentation level
> of the loop.
Right. Will do.
>
>> + }
>> + ret = 0;
>> +out_close:
>> + closedir(dp);
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Get type and config of an iMC counter's read event. */
>> static int read_from_imc_dir(char *imc_dir, unsigned int *count)
>> {
>> - char cas_count_cfg[1024], imc_counter_cfg[1024], imc_counter_type[1024];
>> + char imc_counter_type[1024];
I'll also change imc_counter_type to PATH_MAX.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 0:19 [PATCH v2 0/9] selftests/resctrl: Fixes and improvements focused on Intel platforms Reinette Chatre
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] selftests/resctrl: Improve accuracy of cache occupancy test Reinette Chatre
2026-03-06 9:47 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-06 19:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-03-09 7:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] selftests/resctrl: Do not store iMC counter value in counter config structure Reinette Chatre
2026-03-06 9:51 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-06 19:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] selftests/resctrl: Prepare for parsing multiple events per iMC Reinette Chatre
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] selftests/resctrl: Support multiple events associated with iMC Reinette Chatre
2026-03-06 10:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-06 19:25 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] selftests/resctrl: Increase size of buffer used in MBM and MBA tests Reinette Chatre
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] selftests/resctrl: Raise threshold at which MBM and PMU values are compared Reinette Chatre
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] selftests/resctrl: Remove requirement on cache miss rate Reinette Chatre
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] selftests/resctrl: Simplify perf usage in CAT test Reinette Chatre
2026-03-04 0:19 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] selftests/resctrl: Reduce L2 impact on " Reinette Chatre
2026-03-06 10:35 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-06 19:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-03-04 15:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] selftests/resctrl: Fixes and improvements focused on Intel platforms Chen, Yu C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c69d8068-852e-4029-b079-52fd0a9380ec@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox