From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 11/18] x86/resctrl: Allocate a new field in union mon_data_bits
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:29:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7ee790e-07e2-48f7-af7a-194760ce9b79@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621223859.43471-12-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 6/21/24 3:38 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> When Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode is enabled the legacy monitor reporting
> files must report the sum of the data from all of the SNC nodes that
> share the L3 cache that is referenced by the monitor file.
>
> Resctrl squeezes all the attributes of these files into 32-bits so they
> can be stored in the "priv" field of struct kernfs_node.
>
> Currently only three monitor events are defined by enum resctrl_event_id
> so reducing it from 8-bits to 7-bits still provides more than enough
> space to represent all the known event types. But note that this choice
> was arbitrary. The "rid" field is also far wider than needed for the
> current number of resource id types. This structure is purely internal
> to resctrl, no ABI issues with modifying it. Subsequent changes may
> rearrange the allocation of bits between each of the fields as needed.
>
> Give the bit to a new "sum" field that indicates that reading this file
> must sum across SNC nodes. This bit also indicates that the domid field
> is the id of an L3 cache (instead of a domain id) to find which domains
> must be summed.
>
> Fix up other issues in the kerneldoc description for mon_data_bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index d04018b8b571..f66c7f12e91e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -127,19 +127,25 @@ struct mon_evt {
> };
>
> /**
> - * union mon_data_bits - Monitoring details for each event file
> + * union mon_data_bits - Monitoring details for each event file.
> * @priv: Used to store monitoring event data in @u
> - * as kernfs private data
> - * @rid: Resource id associated with the event file
> - * @evtid: Event id associated with the event file
> - * @domid: The domain to which the event file belongs
> - * @u: Name of the bit fields struct
> + * as kernfs private data.
> + * @u.rid: Resource id associated with the event file.
> + * @u.evtid: Event id associated with the event file.
> + * @u.sum: Set when event must be summed across multiple
> + * domains.
> + * @u.domid: When @u.sum is zero this is the domain to which
> + * the event file belongs. When @sum is one this
> + * is the id of the L3 cache that all domains to be
> + * summed share.
> + * @u: Name of the bit fields struct.
Thank you for including a fix to the kerneldoc.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 22:38 [PATCH v21 00/18] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 01/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new domain scope Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 02/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare to split rdt_domain structure Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 03/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for different scope for control/monitor operations Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 04/18] x86/resctrl: Split the rdt_domain and rdt_hw_domain structures Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 05/18] x86/resctrl: Add node-scope to the options for feature scope Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 06/18] x86/resctrl: Introduce snc_nodes_per_l3_cache Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 07/18] x86/resctrl: Block use of mba_MBps mount option on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 08/18] x86/resctrl: Prepare for new Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 09/18] x86/resctrl: Add a new field to struct rmid_read for summation of domains Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:29 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 10/18] x86/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir() with a helper function Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 11/18] x86/resctrl: Allocate a new field in union mon_data_bits Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:29 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 12/18] x86/resctrl: Create Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) monitor files Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 13/18] x86/resctrl: Handle removing directories in Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) mode Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 14/18] x86/resctrl: Fill out rmid_read structure for smp_call*() to read a counter Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-26 19:35 ` Tony Luck
2024-06-26 21:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-27 17:31 ` Luck, Tony
2024-06-27 17:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 15/18] x86/resctrl: Make __mon_event_count() handle sum domains Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 16/18] x86/resctrl: Enable shared RMID mode on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems Tony Luck
2024-06-25 23:35 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 17/18] x86/resctrl: Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) detection Tony Luck
2024-06-21 22:38 ` [PATCH v21 18/18] x86/resctrl: Update documentation with Sub-NUMA cluster changes Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7ee790e-07e2-48f7-af7a-194760ce9b79@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox