[PATCH 5.15.y] io_uring/io-wq: check IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside work run loop

Jianqiang kang
2026-02-26T06:27:23Z

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

[ Upstream commit 10dc959398175736e495f71c771f8641e1ca1907 ]

Currently this is checked before running the pending work. Normally this
is quite fine, as work items either end up blocking (which will create a
new worker for other items), or they complete fairly quickly. But syzbot
reports an issue where io-wq takes seemingly forever to exit, and with a
bit of debugging, this turns out to be because it queues a bunch of big
(2GB - 4096b) reads with a /dev/msr* file. Since this file type doesn't
support ->read_iter(), loop_rw_iter() ends up handling them. Each read
returns 16MB of data read, which takes 20 (!!) seconds. With a bunch of
these pending, processing the whole chain can take a long time. Easily
longer than the syzbot uninterruptible sleep timeout of 140 seconds.
This then triggers a complaint off the io-wq exit path:

INFO: task syz.4.135:6326 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted syzkaller #0
Blocked by coredump.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz.4.135 state:D stack:26824 pid:6326 tgid:6324 ppid:5957 task_flags:0x400548 flags:0x00080000
Call Trace:
<TASK>
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5256 [inline]
__schedule+0x1139/0x6150 kernel/sched/core.c:6863
__schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:6945 [inline]
schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:6960
schedule_timeout+0x257/0x290 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:75
do_wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:100 [inline]
__wait_for_common+0x2fc/0x4e0 kernel/sched/completion.c:121
io_wq_exit_workers io_uring/io-wq.c:1328 [inline]
io_wq_put_and_exit+0x271/0x8a0 io_uring/io-wq.c:1356
io_uring_clean_tctx+0x10d/0x190 io_uring/tctx.c:203
io_uring_cancel_generic+0x69c/0x9a0 io_uring/cancel.c:651
io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:19 [inline]
do_exit+0x2ce/0x2bd0 kernel/exit.c:911
do_group_exit+0xd3/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1112
get_signal+0x2671/0x26d0 kernel/signal.c:3034
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8f/0x7e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:337
__exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:41 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x8c/0x540 kernel/entry/common.c:75
__exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:226 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:256 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:159 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:194 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x4ee/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fa02738f749
RSP: 002b:00007fa0281ae0e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00007fa0275e6098 RCX: 00007fa02738f749
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 00007fa0275e6098
RBP: 00007fa0275e6090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fa0275e6128 R14: 00007fff14e4fcb0 R15: 00007fff14e4fd98

There's really nothing wrong here, outside of processing these reads
will take a LONG time. However, we can speed up the exit by checking the
IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT inside the io_worker_handle_work() loop, as syzbot will
exit the ring after queueing up all of these reads. Then once the first
item is processed, io-wq will simply cancel the rest. That should avoid
syzbot running into this complaint again.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/68a2decc.050a0220.e29e5.0099.GAE@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+4eb282331cab6d5b6588@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
[ Minor conflict resolved. ]
Signed-off-by: Jianqiang kang <jianqkang@sina.cn>
---
io_uring/io-wq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
index c5d249f5d214..926890f5086e 100644
--- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
+++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
@@ -554,9 +554,9 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_worker *worker)
struct io_wqe_acct *acct = io_wqe_get_acct(worker);
struct io_wqe *wqe = worker->wqe;
struct io_wq *wq = wqe->wq;
- bool do_kill = test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &wq->state);

do {
+ bool do_kill = test_bit(IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT, &wq->state);
struct io_wq_work *work;
get_next:
/*
--
2.34.1