From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local b/w unavailable
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:39:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4994218-a7a2-4505-868e-a5c825ca4db0@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTluypa9bCWv4k2n@agluck-desk3>
Hi Tony,
On 10/25/23 14:38, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 02:46:53PM +0200, Peter Newman wrote:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 8:16 PM Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>>> @@ -418,6 +418,14 @@ static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static struct mbm_state *get_mbm_data(struct rdt_domain *dom_mbm, int rmid)
>>> +{
>>> + if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
>>> + return &dom_mbm->mbm_local[rmid];
>>> +
>>> + return &dom_mbm->mbm_total[rmid];
>>> +}
>>
>> That looks very similar to the get_mbm_state() function I added to
>> this same file recently:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221220164132.443083-2-peternewman%40google.com
>>
>> I think the name you picked is misleadingly general. "local if
>> available, otherwise total" seems to be a choice specific to the mbps
>> controller. I think these functions should be reconciled a little
>> better.
>>
>
> Peter (and Babu, who made the same point about get_mbm_state().
>
> Do you want to see your function extended to do the "pick an MBM event?"
>
> I could add a s/w defined "event" to the enum resctrl_event_id and
> extend get_mbm_state() like this:
>
>
> static struct mbm_state *get_mbm_state(struct rdt_domain *d, u32 rmid,
> enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
> {
> switch (evtid) {
> case QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID:
> return &d->mbm_total[rmid];
> case QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID:
> return &d->mbm_local[rmid];
> + case QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_OR_TOTAL_EVENT_ID:
> + if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
> + return &d->mbm_local[rmid];
> + if (is_mbm_total_enabled())
> + return &d->mbm_total[rmid];
> + fallthrough;
> default:
> return NULL;
> }
> }
>
> Is this the direction you are thinking of?
No. I was not thinking bit different.
You need these changes in only two functions, mbm_bw_count and
update_mba_bw. You decide which event you want to use based on availability,
Something like this. I updated mbm_bw_count.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
index 0ad23475fe16..302993e4fbc3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
@@ -436,8 +436,16 @@ static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct
rmid_read *rr)
*/
static void mbm_bw_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
{
- struct mbm_state *m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
u64 cur_bw, bytes, cur_bytes;
+ struct mbm_state *m;
+ int evtid;
+
+ if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
+ evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID;
+ else
+ evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID;
+
+ m = get_mbm_state(rr->d, rmid, evtid);
cur_bytes = rr->val;
bytes = cur_bytes - m->prev_bw_bytes;
Will this work?
Thanks
Babu
>
> Callers then look like:
>
> static void mbm_bw_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> {
> struct mbm_state *m = get_mbm_state(rr->d, rmid, QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_OR_TOTAL_EVENT_ID);
> u64 cur_bw, bytes, cur_bytes;
>
> similar for the other three places where this is needed.
>
> Any suggestions on how "QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_OR_TOTAL_EVENT_ID" could be
> abbreviated, or just have some different, but descriptive, name?
>
> -Tony
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-24 18:16 [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local b/w unavailable Tony Luck
2023-10-24 18:24 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-24 23:20 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-24 23:43 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-25 16:01 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 12:46 ` Peter Newman
2023-10-25 19:38 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 20:39 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2023-10-25 20:42 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-25 20:52 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 23:41 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 0:07 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-25 21:06 ` Peter Newman
2023-10-26 13:55 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 16:09 ` Luck, Tony
2023-10-26 17:19 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 19:54 ` Tony Luck
2023-10-25 23:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Tony Luck
2023-10-26 20:02 ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Luck
2023-10-26 22:40 ` Moger, Babu
2023-10-26 22:59 ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-03 21:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-03 21:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-07 21:15 ` Tony Luck
2023-11-08 21:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-09 21:27 ` Luck, Tony
2023-11-15 16:09 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-15 21:54 ` Tony Luck
2023-11-16 19:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-11-28 23:14 ` [PATCH v4] x86/resctrl: Add mount option to pick total MBM event Tony Luck
2023-11-29 23:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-01 20:45 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-01 21:47 ` [PATCH v5] x86/resctrl: Add event choices for mba_MBps Tony Luck
2023-12-04 16:24 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-04 18:16 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-04 19:04 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-04 19:45 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-04 20:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-04 21:08 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-04 22:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-04 22:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancements Tony Luck
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] x86/resctrl: Add mount option "mba_MBps_event" Tony Luck
2023-12-08 18:17 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-08 21:57 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-08 22:09 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-08 22:37 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-12 17:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-12 20:02 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-12 21:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-13 1:07 ` Luck, Tony
2023-12-08 18:29 ` Moger, Babu
2023-12-08 21:50 ` Tony Luck
2023-12-12 18:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] x86/resctrl: Use total bandwidth for mba_MBps option when local isn't present Tony Luck
2023-12-08 18:26 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-07 19:56 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] x86/resctrl: Add new "mba_MBps_event" mount option to documentation Tony Luck
2023-12-08 19:22 ` Peter Newman
2023-12-12 18:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-09 22:00 ` [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Implement new MBA_mbps throttling heuristic Tony Luck
2024-01-16 19:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-17 3:36 ` Xiaochen Shen
2024-01-17 3:40 ` Xiaochen Shen
2024-01-18 0:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v2] x86/resctrl: Implement new mba_MBps " Tony Luck
2024-01-22 17:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-22 18:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-01-22 18:41 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-01-22 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-01-22 20:58 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-23 12:12 ` James Morse
2024-01-23 17:07 ` Luck, Tony
2024-01-24 0:29 ` Tony Luck
2024-01-25 17:29 ` Tony Luck
2024-01-22 18:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e4994218-a7a2-4505-868e-a5c825ca4db0@amd.com \
--to=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).