From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA65F299925 for ; Thu, 15 May 2025 12:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.17.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747312883; cv=none; b=tISucMv3u0RhzA//z0flZhlJvwdqU6AYrvWAxaaAcbZdsYpxhtyS7Y/hG1PBr8QaF8H7as0ORovBpV4NoW3D4Xyb+EjjwHXba5otzzwPWeZ7xtrE8YE7HAXzmfu1KmMwpT0kF2QjFPMtkRR/bV2Yv02F10K8j97Yr+tug7fQwv8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747312883; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dKGeHmuc0AMoqMd4c8uF73dFFuyhRt3JICyL+r37aFg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=N4SxdpF+b6XnEV2OeS3KNUoruBMPeFfq/rs5exqtuj+hkTCYoDxPdlyObJqkXdbJwS6yYdrxUSC9GjrxcrBOYIS0F8UZzb0Zvb595fKKMgR49xXReFrkBMdpNxLkfFQR2vxmDJjNo8s1dWdCeIi4g3OrgqGRaDEwofGCKZgXf6E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=heusel.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=heusel.eu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heusel.eu header.i=christian@heusel.eu header.b=xLjzYB1o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.227.17.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=heusel.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=heusel.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heusel.eu header.i=christian@heusel.eu header.b="xLjzYB1o" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heusel.eu; s=s1-ionos; t=1747312827; x=1747917627; i=christian@heusel.eu; bh=ACEh/F0PUTfCw1qiHO8MuM8t4bWtlvu/gCbC9vwARUM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:cc: content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id: mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=xLjzYB1ojZAHcq4EWl9Jusxx70ThHfOMyNmlSQJBz9iOTQw4ThlYkKw3q4UJ671H kY6Z5b3gZIKjLoI33AQZrGAciiVcYX/cY6T93fr6VU1KKtKexW8plGurOMWBC2w52 Rq5GrCM3QF3ojDybasqNTmO1qtzuJpz6W1mMSQ1sPapNw0yjc5HSMjDvupEHCxD34 pZkximzOSWkzY5ps1R5q3N5RXq3DCbNP/gWt4aKb9PiQuo63eaAnf6k0oT8ibe5aJ yYYI4wxHBDUpohlNvkEfud28tykbiFWR5VYMy+BTzs0rQ4Mm+5GMno45H13g3ljiC Igv3wXrS6USl3hLV0w== X-UI-Sender-Class: 55c96926-9e95-11ee-ae09-1f7a4046a0f6 Received: from localhost ([80.187.66.114]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue107 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MV5KC-1uNhMq3oZy-00Yt9A; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:40:27 +0200 Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 14:40:21 +0200 From: Christian Heusel To: Luna Jernberg Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, Mario Limonciello , Alex Deucher , Ray Wu , Wayne Lin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.14 000/197] 6.14.7-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20250512172044.326436266@linuxfoundation.org> <32c592ea-0afd-4753-a81d-73021b8e193c@heusel.eu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="e535jvafayoassw5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:SNlabFiPlNQTwGuUCxIXGH4/0d3iWUjlJ0EyZAtoCQ/RCBAhXdu wFhITo/s+Jc/ndC8Giu1SBZPruJ9BaO7Nlk06qaomH5fpW8OU/l0cxeiIDan1h4ZhiaGHvy Y36+2ke8mWkYhnjRm9cb+i1oKJVGEdykYsjQyB53ETeOd8aNCBqHnl/3ldy+YvyOTmsSokr crkVXTJVf61ssTRXnmQ/w== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:wwCeajMMog0=;vY3teL2xY5Nx/Oyj+fNIrB8mkhK 3X25UwqhCnBDmY6y2lD8ZBbODrF+pLaHFQqgvM1OyZlrc17BCfJbJpr/uh6jkS+Xm0hOA7kQL JDtS4NS1Y65SG+mKrzeQxwEK4QYespDppoq3QZzh0A2yL4XdV5t7d2J5f59O1cOR8hSp8RfzS 2PhHa8puDDoZShSFfpCegsus0sR+6S+6WPI66uafh5lLjhmSMBKsyG8OzjaoOUQSY+NQvo37l 6i0XXeccDZXvDe4tsVqEkQzU1M8Yrq/SwXi4eOBpdtLpLI6HfCfn5bzasi30neUa3EAYC5jlY +evjNrQF9Zlrra8SfGRuDIGS1mOv8XnEHTqPbz6XfF1AHLB84v2ALVXcrBhU189xBqQ9RWQ7v 9Q7wnVWT87lTMnz2o8/PJn2rK8AbOUFlD+2YJLQa3Ezgdr40xGrG2ZbpU7pd/Cap8/DHZvO28 0rFyxg7HvKJPenItPTSdutOuTX5/fjvqUda6DyaubYMR73iVcZps6dW2DASl55uMpn5kkTUlA KZTCi+CEUdyDY1iHdoycvM7XNP/Te+Cc2H+ZqjjS7JO0LXMj+oj6UeKtZlMyzLz2pMEnEqnPN eCpMb34VsPod9NBJE0OaJoSKmEXUgoCbnpArudRylpcnddJmRO4CLUSOKRB8toT9AnnveKnMK RjOEOh7GMY8KW7csAkJttJLDqEMHLu9X5+ZUKVDdFBqFlPsXzeHXJkAXT0jLt520xLbxmNshW oeHD2zaduRvVXrccidMl7I6wn/vgwNDg7sWhO3leZNaolEm9sh2dG863R163PFfZ9WlTB/KnI 3arVyxEPorZyYGmdFTmKenxJO2bppSpjDwPbf+Lz3ITM93MUykFXK4dNkuni1Ud6z8eujCvtL wj3peNvVhbXxG1192zc5pqkEw8j4xEbQanfBtUm57SpdHf1Tzt4wsOl/h7eHSyTbBCwwfYXU0 ITfxCGjRe+Cyc7rMtYj6ByBCoyMOGWBYMrrZwDba5gM7gpOK+pb9utsNx+tc66YZDlGAIxSHg L+rLwCV6i0l5i5QU/lGsP+yz5fl+SiUsUDkeJwQ6ZuPnyMQVCF7kLqN6uKBUy5WO83ryIKEKv Ha/vGtgwUi0jp5s8xDET3k3m81J0PnPX8+FxkHGnvEpXM+CcPVSSSPIG+XgVed/aj83s4GJsi 2EXdTu1wVPrVVlA6EMOxiqP9PoO3JOfiyra4x590Xtrvio3zFfzsg7ZBsWRNIyeaGPcJxP2DL SN4nDsEeRsmy3S6ZMaZxnV/f4JGHgtj0ZDBqCCxKsypBBjC8Xvf1RmeXFt9eOhuC2/Yd/Hv4f FFTzgGYFEhZFU/0nSLHtyQ5ucC/OJB++3ksFWIK4aFRy/j1ZZxiC7x61zR8ensuwqTSsczRgQ bndZSpqhbNQRup5Iu6xcFSIbDmT5miQqZPrtUvXBWYiNCy/MyIrvy8aTgu42e0zScMem+dr70 JEm4pJw== --e535jvafayoassw5 Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.14 000/197] 6.14.7-rc1 review MIME-Version: 1.0 On 25/05/15 02:34PM, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Same problem in rc2 just tested Yes the fix is still on the way to mainline (see the mail from Mario pointing to the patches posted to amd-gfx), but given that it's just some log entries that stop again and nothing serious it should not be of much issue. Cheers, Chris > Den tis 13 maj 2025 kl 07:26 skrev Christian Heusel : > > > > On 25/05/12 07:37PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.14.7 release. > > > There are 197 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, plea= se > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 May 2025 17:19:58 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I have noticed that the following commit produces a whole bunch of lines > > in my journal, which looks like an error for me: > > > > > Wayne Lin > > > drm/amd/display: Fix wrong handling for AUX_DEFER case > > > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0= x01. > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0= x01. > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0= x01. > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0= x01. > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0= x01. > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0= x01. > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0= x01. > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0= x01. > > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written > > > > this does not seem to be serious, i.e. the system otherwise works as > > intended but it's still noteworthy. Is there a dependency commit missing > > maybe? From the code it looks like it was meant to be this way =F0=9F= =A4=94 > > > > You can find a full journal here, with the logspammed parts in > > highlight: > > https://gist.github.com/christian-heusel/e8418bbdca097871489a31d79ed166= d6#file-dmesg-log-L854-L981 > > > > Cheers, > > Chris --e535jvafayoassw5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEb3ea3iR6a4oPcswTwEfU8yi1JYUFAmgl4LUACgkQwEfU8yi1 JYVVuRAA215yB3QegwDZsVFCIU5RTpcQpgDwt3maQYJFBoInHghVmIoVVVs55qEU I2eBdykmCpTenyWI6paJIKA1AfwoX4tFZumA3M7gZKYqhmWx7n9M3da6IDP2a+/t 3GBZAmSn/DTGKsTcgaPzguyEFBJo1lAulBk0dWXd+X3FwmKcdgM39hE7TnR5lULz tqbad718ghHejBd0K5rK+1RarHH/rJ3IvL/wASdL8f/d+eez4Xg7PzJVSpwoGRQG 3tD2zEu+mbWBXvD6RXeqlbLZwNHpBm92otxu+08QFOcsqv+6Wqt1SBq3nv1hLsxZ c9Ha9UxdgoFreKpRIyF5+hEt+Q53Vh8uGpiM1fM6qqC84vvPVBzOSg6jn5MjhLWx o0VQQgHkzXeVh3pQnX0EJ64vQR3VDREXoBw4vdweFcRXwT99/Lo/LTnUXUZ4MqVC nDaqWEWNUNwxAvO6J6PoJbFy7e45+J8k2CgOofc+GfHo/tV1gpD/GpDjOs+3pNui hFIaxPtVbgctdVhguvmJFs1yTrZgbD8ek97Lua9yDaXXgfuLpFwu8DuH2CQd8udY jzL8SmbqHjF8FYD2YyAIzPAsIPgaKY4ziIoCUyzv2Mreg6xxeWiwjJIcezphEWd0 mJ8oYuYJsHI8ndb7FnKv4YM4v/mGlFJs1AV372ethNQGtjH5y58= =DPF9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --e535jvafayoassw5--