From: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
To: "'Bjorn Helgaas'" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"'vidya sagar'" <sagar.tv@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Lucas Stach'" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"'Pratyush Anand'" <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Joao Pinto'" <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: MSI-X support with Synopsys DesignWare IP core driver
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 15:06:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000401d30bc2$7cfdb8c0$76f92a40$@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo58kndyFLOnq-85HK8NnYOG2mMkn3HzRP_+FKPY0La7AQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 1:13 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> This was a multi-part message with HTML, which I think causes the
> mailing list to automatically drop it. Please post this as plain text
> with a changelog and signed-off-by and copy the DesignWare maintainers
> (Jingoo and Joao, cc'd).
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:28 AM, vidya sagar <sagar.tv@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > As you might be knowing it already, in the current pcie-designware.c ,
> there
> > is no support for MSI-X
> > Although there is no native support from Synopsys IP as well to have
> 2048
> > interrupts, we can at least have basic support to get MSI-X also
> allocated
> > (along with MSI) as many as possible in the system at that point. Of
> course,
> > all these interrupts will have the same address to which downstream
> devices
> > need to initiate mem-write transactions. Though it doesn't leverage one
> of
> > the advantages of having MSI-X over MSI, it at least avoids drivers
> falling
> > back to legacy interrupts when the card doesn't support MSI. Some of the
> > Intel NVMe cards are examples here. Legacy interrupt being a shared
> > interrupt, it unnecessarily triggers all other shared ISRs to be called
> > whenever there is a legacy interrupt.
> >
> > I have the following patch which enables MSI-X support also. Would like
> to
> > have your comments on this.
Hi all,
As far as I know, in order to support MSI-X with Synopsys IP, additional
controller is required. For example, GICv2m can be used to do so.
In addition, I think that some HACK patches can be used to support some
MSI-X only PCI cards. In this case, we cannot take advantage of MSI-X really.
Nevertheless, I am not sure that the following patch is safe.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > index af8f6e9..9086253 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > @@ -406,9 +406,6 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller
> *chip,
> > struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > int irq, pos;
> > struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
> >
> > - if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > irq = assign_irq(1, desc, &pos);
> > if (irq < 0)
> > return irq;
> > @@ -426,9 +423,16 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irqs(struct msi_controller
> > *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > struct msi_desc *desc;
> > struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
> >
> > - /* MSI-X interrupts are not supported */
> > - if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX) {
> > + for_each_pci_msi_entry(desc, pdev) {
> > + irq = arch_setup_msi_irq(pdev, desc);
> > + if (irq < 0)
> > + return irq;
> > + if (irq > 0)
> > + return -ENOSPC;
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> >
> > WARN_ON(!list_is_singular(&pdev->dev.msi_list));
> > desc = list_entry(pdev->dev.msi_list.next, struct msi_desc, list);
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-02 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAN7O0+L8ergfE1_Thow2Lz+5UnhLvQO_LmEqhh=XqKfiu3m8XA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-08-01 17:12 ` MSI-X support with Synopsys DesignWare IP core driver Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-02 19:06 ` Jingoo Han [this message]
2017-08-03 14:24 ` Joao Pinto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000401d30bc2$7cfdb8c0$76f92a40$@gmail.com' \
--to=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush.anand@gmail.com \
--cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).