From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Steve Wise" To: "'Sagi Grimberg'" , "'Logan Gunthorpe'" , "'Christoph Hellwig'" , "'James E.J. Bottomley'" , "'Martin K. Petersen'" , "'Jens Axboe'" , "'Stephen Bates'" , "'Max Gurtovoy'" , "'Dan Williams'" , "'Keith Busch'" , "'Jason Gunthorpe'" Cc: , , , , , References: <1490911959-5146-1-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <1490911959-5146-5-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <95928b70-0148-7297-8f5e-5031d996bb98@grimberg.me> In-Reply-To: <95928b70-0148-7297-8f5e-5031d996bb98@grimberg.me> Subject: RE: [RFC 4/8] p2pmem: Add debugfs "stats" file Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:43:38 -0500 Message-ID: <003201d2ae23$6527ef10$2f77cd30$@opengridcomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > > + p2pmem_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("p2pmem", NULL); > > + if (!p2pmem_debugfs_root) > > + pr_info("could not create debugfs entry, continuing\n"); > > + > > Why continue? I think it'd be better to just fail it. > Because not having debugfs support isn't fatal to using p2pmem. So I believe it is better to continue. But this is trivial, IMO, so either was is ok with me. > Besides, this can be safely squashed into patch 1. Yes.