linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	dave@stgolabs.net, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, ming.li@zohomail.com,
	Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com, rrichter@amd.com,
	dan.carpenter@linaro.org, PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com,
	lukas@wunner.de, Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, alucerop@amd.com, ira.weiny@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 05/25] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 16:31:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01bebc6a-c982-4826-8202-703a948c1d48@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925223440.3539069-6-terry.bowman@amd.com>



On 9/25/25 3:34 PM, Terry Bowman wrote:
> Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling uses a procedure distinct
> from the CXL Virtual Hierarchy (VH) handling. This is because of the
> differences in the RCH and VH topologies. Improve the maintainability and
> add ability to enable/disable RCH handling.
> 
> Move and combine the RCH handling code into a single block conditionally
> compiled with the CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS kernel config.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v11->v12:
> - Moved CXL_RCH_RAS Kconfig definition here from following commit.
> 
> v10->v11:
> - New patch
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/Kconfig    |   7 ++
>  drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> index b92d544cfe6f..028201e24523 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> @@ -236,4 +236,11 @@ config CXL_MCE
>  config CXL_RAS
>  	def_bool y
>  	depends on ACPI_APEI_GHES && PCIEAER && CXL_PCI
> +
> +config CXL_RCH_RAS
> +	bool "CXL: Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling"
> +	def_bool n
> +	depends on CXL_RAS
> +	help
> +	  RAS support for Restricted CXL Host (RCH) defined in CXL1.1.
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> index 0875ce8116ff..1ec4ea8c56f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ void cxl_ras_exit(void)
>  	cancel_work_sync(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
>  }
>  
> +static void cxl_handle_cor_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, void __iomem *ras_base);
> +static bool cxl_handle_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, void __iomem *ras_base);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS

I don't love this in the C file. If we are going to have a Kconfig that we can use to gate the code, maybe we need core/ras_rch.c? Don't forget to add the new object entry to KBuild for cxl_test when you do that. 

DJ

>  static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>  {
>  	resource_size_t aer_phys;
> @@ -141,18 +145,6 @@ static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> -{
> -	struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
> -	struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
> -
> -	if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
> -		dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
> -	else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
> -					BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
> -		dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
> -}
> -
>  static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *aer_base = dport->regs.dport_aer;
> @@ -177,6 +169,95 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>  	writel(aer_cmd, aer_base + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
> + * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
> + * status after copying.
> + *
> + * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
> + * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
> + */
> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
> +				 struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
> +{
> +	int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
> +	u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
> +	int n;
> +
> +	if (!aer_base)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
> +	for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
> +		aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
> +
> +	writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
> +	writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
> +				     int *severity)
> +{
> +	if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
> +		if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
> +			*severity = AER_FATAL;
> +		else
> +			*severity = AER_NONFATAL;
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
> +		*severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
> +	struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
> +	struct cxl_dport *dport;
> +	int severity;
> +
> +	struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
> +		cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
> +	if (!port)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
> +		return;
> +
> +	pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
> +	if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
> +		cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> +	else
> +		cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
> +static inline void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
> +static inline void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) { }
> +#endif
> +
> +static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
> +{
> +	struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
> +	struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
> +
> +	if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
> +	else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
> +					BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
> +}
>  
>  /**
>   * cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting - Setup CXL RAS report on this dport
> @@ -270,79 +351,6 @@ static bool cxl_handle_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, void __iomem *ras_base)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
> - * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
> - * status after copying.
> - *
> - * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
> - * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
> - */
> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
> -				 struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
> -{
> -	int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
> -	u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
> -	int n;
> -
> -	if (!aer_base)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	/* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
> -	for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
> -		aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
> -
> -	writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
> -	writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
> -
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
> -/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
> -				     int *severity)
> -{
> -	if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
> -		if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
> -			*severity = AER_FATAL;
> -		else
> -			*severity = AER_NONFATAL;
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
> -		*severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
> -		return true;
> -	}
> -
> -	return false;
> -}
> -
> -static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> -{
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
> -	struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
> -	struct cxl_dport *dport;
> -	int severity;
> -
> -	struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
> -		cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
> -	if (!port)
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
> -		return;
> -
> -	pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
> -	if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
> -		cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> -	else
> -		cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
> -}
> -
>  void cxl_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-25 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-25 22:34 [PATCH v12 00/25] Enable CXL PCIe Port Protocol Error handling and logging Terry Bowman
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 01/25] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL Endpoint handling helper functions Terry Bowman
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 02/25] cxl/pci: Remove unnecessary CXL RCH " Terry Bowman
2025-10-01 15:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 03/25] cxl: Remove ifdef blocks of CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL from core/pci.c Terry Bowman
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 04/25] CXL/AER: Remove CONFIG_PCIEAER_CXL and replace with CONFIG_CXL_RAS Terry Bowman
2025-09-25 23:17   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-01 15:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 05/25] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block Terry Bowman
2025-09-25 23:31   ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2025-10-01 15:23     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-10-06 18:52     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 06/25] CXL/AER: Introduce aer_cxl_rch.c into AER driver for handling CXL RCH errors Terry Bowman
2025-09-25 23:36   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-26 12:32   ` kernel test robot
2025-10-01 15:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 07/25] CXL/PCI: Move CXL DVSEC definitions into uapi/linux/pci_regs.h Terry Bowman
2025-09-25 23:53   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-01 15:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-02 15:25     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-10-03 20:11       ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 08/25] PCI/CXL: Introduce pcie_is_cxl() Terry Bowman
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 09/25] PCI/AER: Report CXL or PCIe bus error type in trace logging Terry Bowman
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-10-06 19:59     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 10/25] CXL/AER: Update PCI class code check to use FIELD_GET() Terry Bowman
2025-09-26  0:02   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-01 16:12   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-02  7:40     ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-30 17:16       ` Bowman, Terry
2025-10-31  5:30         ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 11/25] cxl/pci: Update RAS handler interfaces to also support CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 12/25] cxl/pci: Log message if RAS registers are unmapped Terry Bowman
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 13/25] cxl/pci: Unify CXL trace logging for CXL Endpoints and CXL Ports Terry Bowman
2025-09-26 20:44   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 14/25] cxl/pci: Update cxl_handle_cor_ras() to return early if no RAS errors Terry Bowman
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 15/25] cxl/pci: Map CXL Endpoint Port and CXL Switch Port RAS registers Terry Bowman
2025-09-26 21:10   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-24 10:25     ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-10-24 17:15       ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-24 19:40       ` Bowman, Terry
2025-10-27 16:33         ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 16/25] CXL/PCI: Introduce PCI_ERS_RESULT_PANIC Terry Bowman
2025-09-26 21:26   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-01 16:14   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-03 20:11   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 17/25] cxl/pci: Introduce CXL Endpoint protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-09-26 22:04   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-30 14:06     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-30 16:09       ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-03 20:12   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-10-06 21:07     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 18/25] CXL/AER: Introduce aer_cxl_vh.c in AER driver for forwarding CXL errors Terry Bowman
2025-09-26 22:56   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-03 20:12   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 19/25] cxl: Introduce cxl_pci_drv_bound() to check for bound driver Terry Bowman
2025-09-26 23:02   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-02 12:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-03 20:12   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 20/25] PCI/AER: Dequeue forwarded CXL error Terry Bowman
2025-09-26 23:26   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-03 20:12   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-10-06 20:17     ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 21/25] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL Port protocol error handlers Terry Bowman
2025-09-29 23:32   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-03 20:12   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-10-06 21:28     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 22/25] CXL/PCI: Export and rename merge_result() to pci_ers_merge_result() Terry Bowman
2025-09-26 15:01   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-26 18:10   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 23/25] CXL/PCI: Introduce CXL uncorrectable protocol error recovery Terry Bowman
2025-09-30  0:26   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-30 14:38     ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-30 16:13       ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-30 16:43         ` Bowman, Terry
2025-09-30 16:46           ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-01 13:58             ` Bowman, Terry
2025-10-01 15:33               ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-03 20:12   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 24/25] CXL/PCI: Enable CXL protocol errors during CXL Port probe Terry Bowman
2025-09-30  0:28   ` Dave Jiang
2025-10-03 20:12   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-09-25 22:34 ` [PATCH v12 25/25] CXL/PCI: Disable CXL protocol error interrupts during CXL Port cleanup Terry Bowman
2025-10-03 20:12   ` Cheatham, Benjamin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01bebc6a-c982-4826-8202-703a948c1d48@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).