From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: Add pci=no_e820 cmdline option to ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:56:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0320b854-327b-397f-ba26-e69ea321dd1b@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211005150956.303707-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On 10/5/21 8:09 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some BIOS-es contain a bug where they add addresses which map to system RAM
> in the PCI bridge memory window returned by the ACPI _CRS method, see
> commit 4dc2287c1805 ("x86: avoid E820 regions when allocating address
> space").
>
> To avoid this Linux by default excludes E820 reservations when allocating
> addresses since 2010. Windows however ignores E820 reserved regions for PCI
> mem allocations, instead it avoids these BIOS bugs by allocates addresses
> top-down.
>
> Recently (2020) some systems have shown-up with E820 reservations which
> cover the entire _CRS returned PCI bridge memory window, causing all
> attempts to assign memory to PCI bars which have not been setup by the BIOS
> to fail. For example here are the relevant dmesg bits from a
> Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15IIL 81WE:
>
> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000004bc50000-0x00000000cfffffff] reserved
> [ 0.557473] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x65400000-0xbfffffff window]
>
> Add a pci=no_e820 option which allows disabling the E820 reservations
> check, while still honoring the _CRS provided resources.
>
> And automatically enable this on the "Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15IIL05" to fix
> the touchpad not working on this laptop.
>
> Also add a pci=use_e820 option to allow overruling the results of
> DMI quirks defaulting to no_e820 on some systems.
>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868899
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871793
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe/+bug/1878279
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Hi Hans,
Please update Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt also.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/resource.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/pci/common.c | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c b/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
> index 9b9fb7882c20..6069d86021f0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -23,11 +24,27 @@ static void resource_clip(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> res->start = end + 1;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Some BIOS-es contain a bug where they add addresses which map to system RAM
> + * in the PCI bridge memory window returned by the ACPI _CRS method, see
> + * commit 4dc2287c1805 ("x86: avoid E820 regions when allocating address space").
> + * To avoid this Linux by default excludes E820 reservations when allocating
> + * addresses since 2010. Windows however ignores E820 reserved regions for PCI
> + * mem allocations, instead it avoids these BIOS bugs by allocates addresses
> + * top-down.
> + * Recently (2020) some systems have shown-up with E820 reservations which
> + * cover the entire _CRS returned PCI bridge memory window, causing all
> + * attempts to assign memory to PCI bars which have not been setup by the BIOS
preferably: BARs
> + * to fail. The pci_use_e820 check is there as a workaround for these systems.
> + */
thanks.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 15:09 [PATCH] x86/PCI: Add pci=no_e820 cmdline option to ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows Hans de Goede
2021-10-05 20:56 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2021-10-07 16:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-07 18:36 ` Hans de Goede
2021-10-08 11:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0320b854-327b-397f-ba26-e69ea321dd1b@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox