From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E75BC43387 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E1920866 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="dIvSzUMg" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729385AbfAOQWt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:22:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:36840 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729384AbfAOQWt (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:22:49 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id n2so1442477pgm.3 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:22:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3RFyiBr48haMmABLwkD2mTZ68W2vD9ZPJ2aFBP1uwEE=; b=dIvSzUMge7Clt1X+VeMLdQ4c7HGx2KZOhWXTEBBtULntes82FCQ8EaPfZaUH4OyIlm NXnFxGfIMHRGFg7oHQSpL0Yk6/H7MJkC70VrpvHZigpCtKXhL+GjmmBU1xhxrI/jHHJf mILDDz/j1sKibfAhwMBdHMuwT6yNErCe0SVljIKPr3ufZOMvc+m9Ng614hrLsZUjiLE2 lReIHDC+kxDcq9lciFS8DmXzLPjZVQpor/U7kd0voD2HWXibVhbjwOjvONH/1q3BPMqT 7KkFQYhglm+mfCshZaBYH1HaiBV9e71hbnuAkb7Ebb4J2zhcb6x++q+RcHeVYAJYNPDK I82g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3RFyiBr48haMmABLwkD2mTZ68W2vD9ZPJ2aFBP1uwEE=; b=GcTjyGk/kruuC0oNk9rVe3zZ2J7+crs6P+wmI8RwuQAVr6Ch4M7HNV0GNxKr51IHF5 WWkiqkfFtUeryKiO97y4ONju38Q7v/xWsANvtI2VleJ/U7ezzXVs7xAM8XCLv75sCNHv qoU2J8CQ/IWLHNpeKlkkpT+T5i1K8gzwDBIk1gnvYgYV90Ztg5kCuFgQHN/o7SWYx5tT ex11MJFhqDlmdTXQnCb/UL+cQOjViwlHq9nPYZCmAosGwGK1dCk16xV+4fVFBuyNXxk2 RFX9M43lHcg/ktP2faQFHmWmjB8inK3EsPw1TsinHpi8+aQeiVvDfvwK/xdkG1its8Nw BaoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfXOxFhxNEhzccw0RVQKZd0fagWPL15it4DcZv7rS5lv3vNVqvG Psl8Q4/6kCtDgOc6Gzsq0S7PiQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5BN92wyychkQsC9NlkwYTwj7LISf8qmrNFRYfcsU0YNx62EDfnhbw3aZH13fXJbtSQfLij0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:8ac4:: with SMTP id y187mr4528162pgd.446.1547569368541; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.121] (66.29.188.166.static.utbb.net. [66.29.188.166]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n186sm4477583pfn.137.2019.01.15.08.22.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:22:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: preference to returning -ENOSPC from pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity To: Christoph Hellwig , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Ming Lei , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org References: <20190103013106.26452-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20190114232338.GE33971@google.com> <20190115131140.GB28672@lst.de> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <05cb9e71-e455-a717-c64c-b5242ec38bad@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:22:45 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190115131140.GB28672@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On 1/15/19 6:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 05:23:39PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> Applied to pci/msi for v5.1, thanks! >> >> If this is something that should be in v5.0, let me know and include the >> justification, e.g., something we already merged for v5.0 or regression >> info, etc, and a Fixes: line, and I'll move it to for-linus. > > I'd be tempted to queues this up for 5.0. Ming, what is your position? I think we should - the API was introduced in this series, I think there's little (to no) reason NOT to fix it for 5.0. -- Jens Axboe