Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Check MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_MASK_PARENT in cond_[startup|shutdown]_parent()

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>]

On 01/09/2025 14:30, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 01:10, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> For msi controller that only supports MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_MASK_PARENT,
>> the newly added callback irq_startup() and irq_shutdown() for
>> pci_msi[x]_template will not unmask/mask the interrupt when startup/
>> shutdown the interrupt. This will prevent the interrupt from being
>> enabled/disabled normally.
>>
>> Add the missing check for MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_MASK_PARENT in the
>> cond_[startup|shutdown]_parent(). So the interrupt can be normally
>> unmasked/masked if it does not support MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_MASK_PARENT.
>>
>> Fixes: 54f45a30c0d0 ("PCI/MSI: Add startup/shutdown for per device domains")
>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/aK4O7Hl8NCVEMznB@monster/
>> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/20250826220959.GA4119563@ax162/
>> Reported-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250827093911.1218640-1-wei.fang@nxp.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
>> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> Any updates on this?  It pretty much breaks testing on linux-next for ARM.

Also does it make sense to squash this fix with the original patch? It 
caused boot failures on at least 3 of our boards and so could impact the 
ability to bisect other issues.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic