From: abhijit <abhijitnaik27@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Doubt on first access for PCIe device
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:37:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dacae5d-ab2c-d4ac-c3e3-ca3bd831f7ba@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50712b3b-2943-0b78-9413-257f33b26c3f@gmail.com>
Hi Lorenzo,
Thank you very much for reply.
As you mentioned I noted that, "If a Function must generate a Completion
prior to the initial device Configuration Write Request, 0’s must be
entered into the Bus Number and Device Number fields"
By above statement this means that completion ID will be 0x0000. For the
very first device on any bus, device number will be 0 and function
number will be 0.
Isn't completer (for configuration read) packet will be addressing
itself instead of root complex with bus, device and function number 0?
Regards,
Abhijit
On Tuesday 11 April 2017 07:45 PM, abhijit wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was referring Linux code for PCIe enumeration and I have one doubt
> w.r.t to very first operation that must be done on device.
>
> Currently while scanning for device, we directly read vendor ID from
> device. But PCIE base specification
> "CB-PCI_Express_Base_4.0r0.7_November-11-2016.pdf" section 2.2.6.2
> specifies that,
>
> "Functions must capture the Bus and Device Numbers supplied with all
> Type 0 Configuration Write Requests completed by the Function and supply
> these numbers in the Bus and Device Number fields of the Requester ID
> for all Requests initiated by the Device/Function."
>
> Here I am assuming, the completer ID will be device number and function
> number that will eventually programmed in to device. In that case, my
> question is, without first write, how read request(VENDOR ID read) is
> serviced/routed?
>
> Sorry I am feeling bit confused, help will be appreciated.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-21 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 14:15 Doubt on first access for PCIe device abhijit
2017-04-19 5:00 ` Jon Masters
2017-04-19 10:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
[not found] ` <CANaY3hNcB0Yk=2f7S+J2r+wtd6T7mLd+ZNprNHFkMegZzvx7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
2017-04-21 15:59 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-24 6:22 ` abhijit
2017-04-24 10:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-24 11:15 ` abhijit
2017-04-21 10:07 ` abhijit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0dacae5d-ab2c-d4ac-c3e3-ca3bd831f7ba@gmail.com \
--to=abhijitnaik27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).