From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: pciehp: Use down_read/write_nested(reset_lock) to fix lockdep errors
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:15:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dcac663-4726-6deb-d518-3f29583b7baf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129185946.GA1475@wunner.de>
Hi Lukas,
First of all thank you for the review and for all the remarks,
I agree with all of them, so I'll incorporate all of them in v2
of this patch-set including squashing the 2 patches together.
On 11/29/21 19:59, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:39:43PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Use down_read_nested() and down_write_nested() when taking the
>>> ctrl->reset_lock rw-sem, passing the PCI-device depth in the hierarchy
>>> as lock subclass parameter. This fixes the following false-positive lockdep
>>> report when unplugging a Lenovo X1C8 from a Lenovo 2nd gen TB3 dock:
>> [...]
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>
>> That's exactly what I had in mind, thanks.
>
> Hm, I found the notes that I took when I investigated Theodore's report:
> Using a subclass may be problematic because it's limited to a value < 8
> (MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES). If there's a hotplug port at a deeper level
> than 8 in the PCI hierarchy (can easily happen, Thunderbolt daisy chain
> allows up to 6 devices, each device contains a PCIe switch, so 2 levels per
> device), look_up_lock_class() in kernel/locking/lockdep.c will emit a BUG
> error message.
>
> It may be necessary to call lockdep_register_key() for each level or
> for each hotplug port and assign the lock with lockdep_set_class()
> (or ..._and_name() and use the dev_name()).
>
> It's these complications that made me put aside the problem back in the day.
> My apologies for not remembering them earlier.
No worries.
I've been looking at how to rework things and this should be pretty doable.
My plan is to have a global static array of lock_class_key-s in
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c, one per depth level (say 32 of them ?)
and then use lockdep_set_class() and that looks like it should be pretty
doable.
When using a static global array of lock_class_key-s there is no need to call
lockdep_register_key().
Also see:
drivers/usb/storage/usb.c
Which does something similar to avoid issues when a single usb-device has
multiple USB-storage interfaces.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-30 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-29 12:19 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Add a pci_dev_depth() helper function Hans de Goede
2021-11-29 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: pciehp: Use down_read/write_nested(reset_lock) to fix lockdep errors Hans de Goede
2021-11-29 15:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-11-29 18:59 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-11-30 10:15 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-11-30 19:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-12-02 11:52 ` Hans de Goede
2021-11-29 15:45 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-11-29 23:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0dcac663-4726-6deb-d518-3f29583b7baf@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox