linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, andiry.xu@amd.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	trenn@suse.de, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Marek <MMarek@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: enable pci MSI/MSIX in usb core
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:26:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328664392.12669.233.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207221317.GA6103@xanatos>

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 14:13 -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:27:43AM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > I'm trying to track down an oops on my for-usb-linus queue that could
> > either be related to Alex's original MSI work around patch, or the patch
> > Oliver posted for working around PCI MMIO not being enabled fast enough.
> > I don't want to review this MSI improvement patch until I'm sure the
> > original MSI work around patch is stable.
> > 
> > Alex, please give me time to debug bug fixes for 3.3 before pushing on
> > features for 3.4.
> 
> Alex, your original MSI enabling patch simply does not work.  The xHCI
> PCI driver was marked as const and the xHCI PCI probe function oopsed as
> soon as it tried to add HCD_MSI_FIRST to driver->flags.  Please test all
> the patches in your patchsets individually to make sure they don't cause
> bugs, as this will break git-bisect.  It's especially troublesome to not
> test a patch I've said will be needed for stable, since we really try
> not to break stable. </grumpy maintainer rant>

I am sorry for bring trouble on the patch. 
But all my patches were tested with possible USB3 HCD in our site,
include a NEC device and the BIOS broken Intel panther point HCD.

[    3.772513] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
[    3.772515] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: PCI INT A: no GSI
[    3.772552] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: setting latency timer to 64
[    3.772593] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X
[    3.772602] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: xHCI Host Controller
[    3.772639] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: new USB bus registered, assigned
bus number 1

Maybe some kernel configuration related with this oops? 

> 
> The oops brings up an interesting point.  I think the reason the xHCI
> PCI driver structure is marked as const is because it's shared across
> all xHCI hosts in the system.  Even if you remove the const keyword, you
> could be modifying the flags while another xHCI host controller is being
> initialized.
> 
> I think PCI probe isn't run in parallel, but you could still have the
> case where the Intel Panther Point xHCI PCI probe runs first,
> HCD_MSI_FIRST gets added to the hcd driver flags, and then the PCI probe
> runs for a Fresco Logic add-in card that doesn't handle MSI, and the USB
> core doesn't attempt to allocate the legacy IRQ because HCD_MSI_FIRST is
> set.  Then the Fresco Logic host controller will be left with no
> interrupt.

Yes, you are right here.
So, the first patch naturally have this problem. But my latest patch:
enable MSI in usb-core won't the problem. Because it direct skip the
Fresco Card for MSI, not get help from flags. 

So, let's drop the previous 2 patches and using this latest one? 
> 
> 
> Alan, is the hc_driver structure (xhci_pci_hc_driver) shared across all
> xHCI PCI hosts in the system?
> 
> Sarah Sharp



  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-08  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1328531341-22705-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
     [not found] ` <4F311233.9070404@intel.com>
     [not found]   ` <20120207144204.GA7214@kroah.com>
2012-02-07 17:27     ` [PATCH] usb: enable pci MSI/MSIX in usb core Sarah Sharp
2012-02-07 22:13       ` Sarah Sharp
2012-02-08  1:26         ` Alex,Shi [this message]
2012-02-08  6:27           ` Alex,Shi
2012-02-08  9:11             ` Alex,Shi
2012-02-14  0:20               ` Sarah Sharp
2012-02-14  0:25                 ` [RFT] USB: Try MSI first before line IRQ for Intel PCIe USB3 HCD Sarah Sharp
2012-02-14  4:43                   ` Alex,Shi
2012-02-16  2:36                 ` [PATCH] usb: enable pci MSI/MSIX in usb core Alex,Shi
2012-02-17  6:44                   ` Alex,Shi
2012-02-17  8:13                     ` Clemens Ladisch
2012-02-17  8:46                       ` Alex,Shi
2012-02-17 10:15                         ` Clemens Ladisch
2012-02-18  6:28                           ` Andiry Xu
2012-02-20  0:57                             ` Alex,Shi
2012-02-20  3:52                     ` Alex,Shi
2012-02-08 15:07         ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1328664392.12669.233.camel@debian \
    --to=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=MMarek@suse.com \
    --cc=andiry.xu@amd.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.de \
    --cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).