From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:9919 "EHLO mga14.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752539Ab2GaAWP (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:22:15 -0400
Message-ID: <1343694132.2591.4.camel@yhuang-dev>
Subject: Re: bisected regression, v3.5 -> next-20120724: PCI PM causes USB
 hotplug failure
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:22:12 +0800
In-Reply-To: <873949p4p8.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1207241312050.1164-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
	 <87r4s0opck.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <87pq7ko532.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
	 <1343190864.10311.26.camel@yhuang-dev> <87k3xskvqq.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
	 <CAC=cRTOi+=49+_4VuMuBR8rTPvjXLMVhNBFbr3SHgNyxfnKQUA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <874now7xi8.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <1343292851.3874.12.camel@yhuang-dev>
	 <87k3xqyfm3.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <1343367309.3874.21.camel@yhuang-dev>
	 <87sjcd4lgs.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <1343618131.3874.37.camel@yhuang-dev>
	 <871ujtr7rz.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
	 <CAC=cRTO7A2MSWX9hV3sR2xpJc5+c2-0+QhsyM0gURFhLfnNW-A@mail.gmail.com>
	 <873949p4p8.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-pci.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 18:57 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
> >> Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> Do you have time to test the following patch to fix the lspci issue?
> >>>
> >>> Subject: [BUGFIX] PCI/PM: Keep parent bridge active when read/write config reg
> >>
> >>
> >> Sure.  But keep this going and I will file a request for modular build
> >> of the PCI subsystem :-)
> >
> > Why?  All not so old PC hardware has PCI/PCIe devices.
> 
> So that I didn't have to reboot all the time to test your new patches...
> 
> It was a (bad) joke.  I don't really think my laptop would work all that
> well without PCI.

Haha, understood now.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying