linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>,
	Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 10:46:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349750799.5332.1.camel@yhuang-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3734460.X8hLyTaasd@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 10:09 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Make ACPI power management routines and PCI power management
> routines depending on ACPI take device PM QoS flags into account
> when deciding what power state to put the device into.
> 
> In particular, after this change acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() will
> not return ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD as the deepest available low-power
> state if PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF is requested for the device and it
> will not require remote wakeup to work for the device in the returned
> low-power state if there is at least one PM QoS flags request for the
> device, but PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP is not requested for it.
> 
> Accordingly, acpi_pci_set_power_state() will refuse to put the
> device into D3cold if PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF is requested for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>

Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>

Best Regards,
Huang Ying



  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-09  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-28 21:51 [RFD][PATCH 0/7] PM / QoS: Support for PM QoS device flags Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-28 21:52 ` [RFD][PATCH 1/7] PM / QoS: Prepare device structure for adding more constraint types Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-28 21:52 ` [RFD][PATCH 2/7] PM / QoS: Introduce request and constraint data types for PM QoS flags Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-29  6:02   ` Lan Tianyu
2012-09-29 21:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-28 21:53 ` [RFD][PATCH 3/7] PM / QoS: Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for more request types Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-28 21:54 ` [RFD][PATCH 4/7] PM / QoS: Introduce device PM QoS flags support Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-28 21:55 ` [RFD][PATCH 5/7] PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-30  8:53   ` Aaron Lu
2012-10-30 15:29     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-28 21:56 ` [RFD][PATCH 6/7] PM / Domains: Check device PM QoS flags in pm_genpd_poweroff() Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-28 21:56 ` [RFD][PATCH 7/7] PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-29  3:16   ` Huang Ying
2012-09-29 21:39     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-12 21:07   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-12 23:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-01 16:17 ` [RFD][PATCH 0/7] PM / QoS: Support for PM QoS device flags Pihet-XID, Jean
2012-10-02  2:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-08  8:02 ` [PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-08  8:04   ` [PATCH 1/7] PM / QoS: Prepare device structure for adding more constraint types Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-10  3:15     ` mark gross
2012-10-10 23:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-08  8:05   ` [PATCH 2/7] PM / QoS: Introduce request and constraint data types for PM QoS flags Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-10  3:21     ` mark gross
2012-10-08  8:06   ` [PATCH 3/7] PM / QoS: Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for more request types Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-10  3:37     ` mark gross
2012-10-08  8:07   ` [PATCH 4/7] PM / QoS: Introduce PM QoS device flags support Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-10  3:37     ` mark gross
2012-10-08  8:07   ` [PATCH 5/7] PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-10  3:33     ` mark gross
2012-10-08  8:08   ` [PATCH 6/7] PM / Domains: Check device PM QoS flags in pm_genpd_poweroff() Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-10  3:35     ` mark gross
2012-10-08  8:09   ` [PATCH 7/7] PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-09  2:46     ` Huang Ying [this message]
2012-10-10  3:36     ` mark gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1349750799.5332.1.camel@yhuang-dev \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).