From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:2636 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753341Ab2LEWFe (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:05:34 -0500 Message-ID: <1354745132.2355.98.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] e1000e: Use standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields From: Jeff Kirsher Reply-To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Alex Duyck , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Don Skidmore , Peter P Waskiewicz Jr , Bruce Allan , Jesse Brandeburg , Greg Rose , John Ronciak , Carolyn Wyborny Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:05:32 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20121205205755.13851.77284.stgit@bhelgaas.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <20121205205724.13851.50508.stgit@bhelgaas.mtv.corp.google.com> <20121205205755.13851.77284.stgit@bhelgaas.mtv.corp.google.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2pjvvtxpgy2QV9QVilXh" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-2pjvvtxpgy2QV9QVilXh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 13:57 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Use the standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields. >=20 > Previously we used PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S and PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 > directly, but > these are defined for the Linux ASPM interfaces, e.g., > pci_disable_link_state(), and only coincidentally match the actual > register > bits. PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM, also part of that interface, does not > match > the register bit. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas > CC: Jeff Kirsher > CC: Jesse Brandeburg > CC: Bruce Allan > CC: Carolyn Wyborny > CC: Don Skidmore > CC: Greg Rose > CC: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr > CC: Alex Duyck > CC: John Ronciak > CC: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)=20 Thanks I will add this patch to my queue for e1000e. Since this is patch 7 of 12, are there PCI dependent patches in the series that need to be applied before? --=-2pjvvtxpgy2QV9QVilXh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJQv8UsAAoJEOVv75VaS+3Ov98P/1KnBmfLz02iWZ2G4CJ5tfMo ZeL4U3jU3mrL3MXJWJ0+2NS3Mfn9NyBdEsqCLv81DS5dBz8rHctfX/ZuKVxSz/F2 HICI936Xtxox/LuUsMGtxNOl+Lhx+Rb5xr3p7OG5Eb1cjoQ4FnL4+iIlZoWjohvJ T3yDyVY04nAhZ5LPsvqIQ0BvFP23qMLbghzYXXPmd5RZkbDNlQ61OGUQpWm+Qoae yzktJ5DU2Tf27xrEsq65S/x1sF7MpT/xQ7BJygOaeUm/SWnWd3nGQh90tfAPKzcA Z0CfhihzhxjjwjtD0aRJay6qp+S3WhS95oaUNctPzXT/tHC+BDH+PdC8qbTkvFms v1osFFGuonpcGFACo2zNtqUpFjBOJigXYg1eBIdvEDkLzNYx3/pOtlNv8Jppli2l mWPtA85NzMQPcIIWBX635mdSUSaAACmR/dIe6qnUb+WbOKpIG2hGsmSdYK6zmRZi 1ZRa3mlAlbA24GTiYHH0jGbx288dln1xTIu51C/28kVgyw/jmLeF1vFB1cvMWxYL zxD0O80a449V548OcPNoTceV7pydxVMKVKFeqOsJgDYX8+GZF6bYtks1YRZZk6qg PgEPF4zCX9y6OnE36Id8FuMlJm70g8kCoWHHyD/458NGtF02DbuNpI+BfWc6GVFO cvIVYQwZb1Lzq10yTvbZ =zS52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2pjvvtxpgy2QV9QVilXh--