From: Myron Stowe <mstowe@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, rjw <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:47:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359931635.2426.98.camel@zim.stowe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo4fbNzFaBxH+eKD+BKVgghyCJEYLDMzc6_gdxABAPe3QQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 14:09 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:07:42 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> As discussed in thread at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1946851/,
> >> there's no value in supporting CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT=m any more.
> >> So change Kconfig and code to only support building pci_slot as
> >> built-in driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
> I think we should eventually get rid of acpi_pci_register_driver() and
> do this initialization directly from acpi_pci_root_add(). But
> removing the module option here is a good first step.
Bjorn, Rafael:
If either of you are interested in that still let me know and I can
re-work any or all of the "PCI/ACPI: Remove "pci_root" sub-driver
support" series - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/7/11
Note [PATCH 13/15] was effectively the same as below and continued on
with initializing directly from acpi_pci_root_add() in [PATCH 14/15].
There may have been worthwhile fixes in some of the earlier content such
as [PATCH 11/15] worth re-considering also.
Thanks,
Myron
>
> Rafael, do you want to apply this (and [6/8]) via your tree? If not,
> I can take it.
>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +----
> >> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 +++++
> >> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c | 13 +------------
> >> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
> >> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> >> index 0300bf6..7efd0d0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> >> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE
> >> is about half of the penalty and is rarely useful.
> >>
> >> config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> >> - tristate "PCI slot detection driver"
> >> + bool "PCI slot detection driver"
> >> depends on SYSFS
> >> default n
> >> help
> >> @@ -308,9 +308,6 @@ config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> >> i.e., segment/bus/device/function tuples, with physical slots in
> >> the system. If you are unsure, say N.
> >>
> >> - To compile this driver as a module, choose M here:
> >> - the module will be called pci_slot.
> >> -
> >> config X86_PM_TIMER
> >> bool "Power Management Timer Support" if EXPERT
> >> depends on X86
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> >> index e050254..7374cfc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> >> @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ struct acpi_ec {
> >>
> >> extern struct acpi_ec *first_ec;
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> >> +void acpi_pci_slot_init(void);
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline void acpi_pci_slot_init(void) { }
> >> +#endif
> >> int acpi_pci_root_init(void);
> >> int acpi_ec_init(void);
> >> int acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(void);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> >> index d22585f..a7d7e77 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> >> @@ -330,19 +330,8 @@ static struct dmi_system_id acpi_pci_slot_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
> >> {}
> >> };
> >>
> >> -static int __init
> >> -acpi_pci_slot_init(void)
> >> +void __init acpi_pci_slot_init(void)
> >> {
> >> dmi_check_system(acpi_pci_slot_dmi_table);
> >> acpi_pci_register_driver(&acpi_pci_slot_driver);
> >> - return 0;
> >> }
> >> -
> >> -static void __exit
> >> -acpi_pci_slot_exit(void)
> >> -{
> >> - acpi_pci_unregister_driver(&acpi_pci_slot_driver);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -module_init(acpi_pci_slot_init);
> >> -module_exit(acpi_pci_slot_exit);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> index f8a0d0f..cb964ac 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> @@ -1732,6 +1732,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> >>
> >> acpi_power_init();
> >> acpi_pci_root_init();
> >> + acpi_pci_slot_init();
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
> >>
> > --
> > I speak only for myself.
> > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-03 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 16:07 [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] introduce PCI bus notifier chain to get rid of the ACPI PCI subdriver interfaces Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/8] PCI: make PCI device create/destroy logic symmetric Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/8] PCI: split registration of PCI bus devices into two stages Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/8] PCI: add a blocking notifier chain for PCI bus addition/removal Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-21 16:18 ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-21 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module Jiang Liu
2013-01-21 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-28 21:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 21:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-28 21:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 22:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-28 22:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-28 22:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 2:07 ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-29 2:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 2:45 ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-29 2:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29 4:36 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-29 4:36 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-29 1:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-03 22:47 ` Myron Stowe [this message]
2013-02-03 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 5/8] PCI, ACPI: hook PCI bus notifications to create/destroy PCI slots Jiang Liu
2013-01-21 0:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 6/8] pci_slot: replace printk(KERN_xxx) with pr_xxx() Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 7/8] PCI/PCIe: add "pci=nopciehp" to disable PCIe native hotplug Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 17:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-18 17:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-18 22:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 16:19 ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-18 22:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-19 1:56 ` Yijing Wang
2013-01-19 14:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-18 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH v5 8/8] PCI/PCIe: only claim PME from firmware when CONFIG_PCIE_PME is enabled Jiang Liu
2013-01-20 23:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-21 17:06 ` Jiang Liu
2013-01-28 20:56 ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] introduce PCI bus notifier chain to get rid of the ACPI PCI subdriver interfaces Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-29 0:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-29 2:04 ` Jiang Liu
2013-02-01 16:13 ` Jiang Liu
2013-02-01 22:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359931635.2426.98.camel@zim.stowe \
--to=mstowe@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).