linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: PCI warning on boot 3.8.0-rc1
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:36:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360010164.11144.542.camel@bling.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130204123041.31e402df@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>

On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 12:30 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:28:04 -0700
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 10:36 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > I think drivers/pci/search.c is identical between 3.7 and 3.8-rc1.  Is
> > > > this the first time you've turned on the IOMMU on that box?
> > > 
> > > It exists in 3.7 and earlier kernels, just haven't turned on same config.
> > > 
> > > > It's the same warning as in this bugzilla:
> > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44881, and there's a patch
> > > > there at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44881#c11, but
> > > > it's just a quirk that turns off VT-d if we find certain broken
> > > > bridges.  It doesn't look like you have any of those (although I don't
> > > > know what you have at 05:00.0).
> > > > 
> > > > Bjorn
> > > 
> > > This is a standard ASUS motherboard, and don't want to disable VT-d.
> > 
> > Stephen,
> > 
> > Can you give the lspci -vvv of device 5:00.0 to see if it's one we've
> > seen before?  Does the patch below help?
> 
> 
> $ sudo lspci -vvv -s 5:00.0
> 05:00.0 PCI bridge: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM1083/1085 PCIe to PCI Bridge (rev 03) (prog-if 01 [Subtractive decode])

Someone has even decided to name this one a PCIe-to-PCI bridge despite
it lacking a PCIe capability.  Thanks,

Alex

> 	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
> 	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
> 	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
> 	Bus: primary=05, secondary=06, subordinate=06, sec-latency=32
> 	I/O behind bridge: 0000f000-00000fff
> 	Memory behind bridge: fff00000-000fffff
> 	Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 00000000fff00000-00000000000fffff
> 	Secondary status: 66MHz+ FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort+ <SERR- <PERR-
> 	BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
> 		PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
> 	Capabilities: [c0] Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 8489
> 
> 
> > Bjorn, I think we need to quirk it somehow.  So far they've all been
> > PCI-to-PCI bridges attached to root ports where we expect it's actually
> > a PCIe-to-PCI bridge.  Seems like maybe we could have the same attached
> > to a downstream port.  The patch below avoids the WARN and gives us a
> > device, but of course pci_is_pcie reports wrong for this device and may
> > cause some trickle down breakage.  A more complete option might be to
> > add a is_pcie flag to the device that can be set independent of
> > pcie_cap.  We'd need to check all the callers for assumptions, but then
> > we could put the quirk in one place and hopefully fix everything.
> > Thoughts?  Thanks,
> > 
> > Alex
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/search.c b/drivers/pci/search.c
> > index bf969ba..65ae270 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/search.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/search.c
> > @@ -42,6 +42,15 @@ pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  		}
> >  		/* PCI device should connect to a PCIe bridge */
> >  		if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE) {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Not all PCIe-to-PCI bridges expose a PCIe
> > +			 * capability.  If we make it to a PCIe root port
> > +			 * and the previous device was a PCI-to-PCI bridge,
> > +			 * assume it was really a PCIe-to-PCI bridge.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> > +			    tmp && tmp->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE)
> > +				return tmp;
> >  			/* Busted hardware? */
> >  			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> >  			return NULL;
> > 
> > 
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-04 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-16 22:38 PCI warning on boot 3.8.0-rc1 Stephen Hemminger
2013-01-30 21:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-04 18:36   ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-02-04 20:28     ` Alex Williamson
2013-02-04 20:30       ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-02-04 20:36         ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2013-02-04 22:41       ` Alex Williamson
2013-02-05  1:36         ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-02-06 15:49         ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-02-06 15:58           ` Alex Williamson
2013-02-12  4:15             ` Alex Williamson
2013-02-12 18:33               ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-04-10 22:36             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-11  0:01               ` Alex Williamson
2013-04-11 17:23                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-15 19:12                   ` Alex Williamson
2013-04-15 19:29                     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1360010164.11144.542.camel@bling.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).