From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@fold.natur.cuni.cz>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.9-rc1: pciehp and eSATA card SiI 3132, no XHCI
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:20:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364545211.1817.228.camel@yhuang-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51548E13.8030308@fold.natur.cuni.cz>
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 19:38 +0100, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> Hi Ying,
> would you please tell me how this report relate to this patch?
>
> [PATCH] PCI / ACPI: Always resume devices on ACPI wakeup notifications
>
> Could you tell me why this PME was being flipped back and forth now?
> Actually, does that make finally some sense to you, pci/acpi devs?
>
>
> Does is help to say that on the SandyBridge chip I have the following root ports
> hooked to the following end devices?:
>
> 1.c1 -> rtl8169 05:00.0
> 1.c3 -> iwlwifi 09:00.0
> 1.c4 -> xhci_hcd 0b:00.0
> 1.c7 -> 00:11: express card slot
>
>
> Why didn't I see interleraved lines with 1.c7 *and* 00:11? See the interleaving
> happening with the network card on 3.7.10 kernel (not broken kernel):
>
> [138268.870070] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link down
> [138270.809811] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link up
> [138365.599744] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link down
> [138370.594343] r8169 0000:05:00.0: PME# enabled
> [138370.623852] pcieport 0000:00:1c.1: PME# enabled
> [169885.247386] pcieport 0000:00:1c.1: PME# disabled
> [169885.267374] r8169 0000:05:00.0: PME# disabled
> [169885.330160] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link down
> [169886.992531] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link up
> [169904.405769] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link down
> [169909.401237] r8169 0000:05:00.0: PME# enabled
> [169909.430782] pcieport 0000:00:1c.1: PME# enabled
> [170090.538980] pcieport 0000:00:1c.1: PME# disabled
> [170090.559088] r8169 0000:05:00.0: PME# disabled
> [170090.640494] r8169 0000:05:00.0: PME# enabled
> [170090.678425] pcieport 0000:00:1c.1: PME# enabled
> [170090.829959] pcieport 0000:00:1c.1: PME# disabled
> [170090.848479] r8169 0000:05:00.0: PME# disabled
> [170090.892011] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link down
> [170090.892134] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link down
> [170090.930998] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link down
> [170092.554553] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth0: link up
I don't know exactly. Can you give me the follow output?
grep . /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/power/control
grep . /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/power/runtime_status
And can you try the following patch?
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-------------------------->
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 8 +++++---
drivers/pci/slot.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c
index 202f4a9..7d4cf1a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pci_hotplug_core.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include "../pci.h"
@@ -473,6 +474,8 @@ int __pci_hp_register(struct hotplug_slot *slot, struct pci_bus *bus,
dbg("Added slot %s to the list\n", name);
out:
mutex_unlock(&pci_hp_mutex);
+ /* Bridge runtime PM state may be influenced by hotplug */
+ pm_runtime_resume(&bus->self->dev);
return result;
}
@@ -489,6 +492,7 @@ int pci_hp_deregister(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug)
{
struct hotplug_slot *temp;
struct pci_slot *slot;
+ struct pci_bus *bus;
if (!hotplug)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -508,8 +512,10 @@ int pci_hp_deregister(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug)
hotplug->release(hotplug);
slot->hotplug = NULL;
+ bus = slot->bus;
pci_destroy_slot(slot);
mutex_unlock(&pci_hp_mutex);
+ pm_runtime_resume(&bus->self->dev);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
index 08c243a..beb9c90 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
@@ -154,9 +154,11 @@ static int pcie_port_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
*/
pci_walk_bus(pdev->subordinate, pci_dev_pme_poll, &pme_poll);
/* Delay for a short while to prevent too frequent suspend/resume */
- if (!pme_poll)
- pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 10);
- return -EBUSY;
+ if (pme_poll)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ if (pci_bus_has_hotplug_slots(pdev->subordinate))
+ return -EBUSY;
+ return pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 10);
}
#else
#define pcie_port_runtime_suspend NULL
diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c
index ac6412f..10b275b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/slot.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c
@@ -345,6 +345,24 @@ out:
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_renumber_slot);
+bool pci_bus_has_hotplug_slots(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ struct pci_slot *slot;
+ bool has_hotplug_slots = false;
+
+ down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
+ list_for_each_entry(slot, &bus->slots, list) {
+ if (slot->hotplug) {
+ has_hotplug_slots = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
+
+ return has_hotplug_slots;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_bus_has_hotplug_slots);
+
/**
* pci_destroy_slot - decrement refcount for physical PCI slot
* @slot: struct pci_slot to decrement
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 2461033a..0d0cc94 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -722,6 +722,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr,
void pci_destroy_slot(struct pci_slot *slot);
void pci_renumber_slot(struct pci_slot *slot, int slot_nr);
int pci_scan_slot(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn);
+bool pci_bus_has_hotplug_slots(struct pci_bus *bus);
struct pci_dev *pci_scan_single_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn);
void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus);
unsigned int pci_scan_child_bus(struct pci_bus *bus);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-29 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 1:00 3.9-rc1: pciehp and eSATA card SiI 3132, no XHCI Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-12 2:51 ` Yijing Wang
2013-03-12 9:57 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-13 2:42 ` Yijing Wang
2013-03-14 0:05 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-14 0:16 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-14 8:38 ` Yijing Wang
[not found] ` <51417C28.40402@huawei.com>
2013-03-14 13:00 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-15 2:41 ` Yijing Wang
2013-03-28 18:38 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-29 8:20 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2013-03-29 13:08 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-29 14:38 ` Huang Ying
2013-03-29 15:12 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-29 14:11 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-29 16:45 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-29 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-30 1:17 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-30 1:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-30 1:53 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-30 17:49 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-30 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-30 23:12 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-31 1:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-30 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-30 22:39 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-30 10:54 ` Huang Ying
2013-03-31 10:35 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-31 14:12 ` Huang Ying
2013-03-31 15:04 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-04-01 7:33 ` Huang Ying
2013-04-01 17:23 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-04-30 21:09 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-05-01 0:20 ` Martin Mokrejs
[not found] ` <515813CB.8020001@fold.natur.cuni.cz>
2013-03-31 23:17 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-04-01 0:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-01 12:06 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-31 18:48 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-14 15:18 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-14 15:20 ` Martin Mokrejs
2013-03-14 17:54 ` Martin Mokrejs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364545211.1817.228.camel@yhuang-dev \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmokrejs@fold.natur.cuni.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).