linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: valmiki <valmikibow@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	helgaas@kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: Need clarity on PCIe MSI interrupt in device tree
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 22:59:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365da01-e990-5ad1-3b26-978d86bca5f8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170104100541.GA8329@leverpostej>

Thanks Mark

On 1/4/2017 3:35 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:47:43AM +0530, valmiki wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
>> I have confusion on MSI interrupt flags in PCIe documetation.
>>
>> MSI interrupts are edge triggered, but i see some controllers use
>> Ex:tegra <0 99 0x4>, here interrupt flags show 0x4 which means level
>> sensitive as per include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h.
>
> As Marc says, this isn't actually a description of an MSI, but rather
> the interrupt generated by the interrupt controller, which is often (but
> not always) built into PCIe host controllers.
>
> This looks something like:
>
> +--------+        +-----------------+            +----------+
> |        |        +----------+      |~~msi~irq~~>|          |
> | Device |==MSI==>| MSI ctrl | PCIe |            | IRQ ctrl |~~~> CPU
> |        |        +----------+      |~~intx~irq~>|          |
> +--------+        +-----------------+            +----------+
>
> Each PCIe device sends MSIs to the MSI controller. In response to this,
> the MSI controller raises a wired interrupt, which is named "msi" in the
> DT binding because it is the interrupt generated by the MSI controller,
> and the PCIe controller may raise several distinct interrupts which all
> need names.
>
>> May i know why is it like this, why MSI depicted as level sensitive
>> in device tree.
>
> As above, the interrupt from the MSI controller to the interrupt
> controller is level sensitive, but this is not the case for the actual
> MSIs.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-04 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-04  3:17 Need clarity on PCIe MSI interrupt in device tree valmiki
2017-01-04  8:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-04 17:28   ` valmiki
2017-01-04 10:05 ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-04 17:29   ` valmiki [this message]
2017-01-04 17:39 ` Need clarity on MSI handling in RC driver valmiki
2017-01-04 17:46   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-06  2:30     ` valmiki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1365da01-e990-5ad1-3b26-978d86bca5f8@gmail.com \
    --to=valmikibow@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).