From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:33250 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238Ab3EQFg1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2013 01:36:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1368768974.20726.1.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: Resource assignment oddities From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Gavin Shan , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Bjorn Helgaas Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:36:14 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <1367712653.11982.19.camel@pasglop> <1367712932.11982.20.camel@pasglop> <1367732090.11982.38.camel@pasglop> <1367740336.11982.41.camel@pasglop> <51871088.4594420a.0ccc.7300SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <1367837311.15842.31.camel@pasglop> <5188b791.a110420a.0bea.077eSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:21 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > I just sent v3, please test that. > > That should be less invasive for v3.10. As it will skip adding failed > resource to failed list when the resource is IORESOURCE_IO, and bus > does not have IORESOURCE_IO. Any news about merging this ? Thanks ! Cheers, Ben.