From: Andrew Murray <amurray@embedded-bits.co.uk>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mohit.kumar@st.com, jg1.han@samsung.com,
Andrew Murray <amurray@embedded-bits.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: designware: Remove unnecessary use of 'conf_lock' spinlock
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:41:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392932494-21630-1-git-send-email-amurray@embedded-bits.co.uk> (raw)
Serialization of configuration accesses is provided by 'pci_lock' in
drivers/pci/access.c thus making the driver's 'conf_lock' superfluous.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <amurray@embedded-bits.co.uk>
---
drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 1 -
drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 1 -
drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 6 ------
drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
index 3de6bfb..32c6d56 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
@@ -546,7 +546,6 @@ static int add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp, struct platform_device *pdev)
pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
pp->ops = &exynos_pcie_host_ops;
- spin_lock_init(&pp->conf_lock);
ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize host\n");
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
index e8663a8..77588f1 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
@@ -480,7 +480,6 @@ static int imx6_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
pp->ops = &imx6_pcie_host_ops;
- spin_lock_init(&pp->conf_lock);
ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize host\n");
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
index 17ce88f..b25adb8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
@@ -640,7 +640,6 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
int size, u32 *val)
{
struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
- unsigned long flags;
int ret;
if (!pp) {
@@ -653,13 +652,11 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->conf_lock, flags);
if (bus->number != pp->root_bus_nr)
ret = dw_pcie_rd_other_conf(pp, bus, devfn,
where, size, val);
else
ret = dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, where, size, val);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->conf_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -668,7 +665,6 @@ static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
int where, int size, u32 val)
{
struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
- unsigned long flags;
int ret;
if (!pp) {
@@ -679,13 +675,11 @@ static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->conf_lock, flags);
if (bus->number != pp->root_bus_nr)
ret = dw_pcie_wr_other_conf(pp, bus, devfn,
where, size, val);
else
ret = dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, where, size, val);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->conf_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
index 3063b35..a10747d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ struct pcie_port {
void __iomem *va_cfg1_base;
u64 io_base;
u64 mem_base;
- spinlock_t conf_lock;
struct resource cfg;
struct resource io;
struct resource mem;
--
1.8.3.2
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-20 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-20 21:41 Andrew Murray [this message]
2014-04-03 22:36 ` [PATCH] PCI: designware: Remove unnecessary use of 'conf_lock' spinlock Bjorn Helgaas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-21 1:52 Jingoo Han
2014-02-21 2:34 ` Hong-Xing.Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392932494-21630-1-git-send-email-amurray@embedded-bits.co.uk \
--to=amurray@embedded-bits.co.uk \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mohit.kumar@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).