From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [Patch Part1 V2 14/29] x86, ioapic: use irq_cfg() instead of irq_get_chip_data() for better readability
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 00:22:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400516594-11544-15-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400516594-11544-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Use defined helper function irq_cfg() instead of irq_get_chip_data() for
better readability.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index 55fb3c1385c5..18d0e8a831c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ int __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
return 0;
}
-static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
+static inline struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
{
return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
}
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *alloc_irq_and_cfg_at(unsigned int at, int node)
if (res < 0) {
if (res != -EEXIST)
return NULL;
- cfg = irq_get_chip_data(at);
+ cfg = irq_cfg(at);
if (cfg)
return cfg;
}
@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
raw_spin_lock(&vector_lock);
/* Mark the inuse vectors */
for_each_active_irq(irq) {
- cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+ cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
if (!cfg)
continue;
@@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@ __apicdebuginit(void) print_IO_APICs(void)
if (chip != &ioapic_chip)
continue;
- cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+ cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
if (!cfg)
continue;
entry = cfg->irq_2_pin;
@@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static void irq_complete_move(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
void irq_force_complete_move(int irq)
{
- struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+ struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
if (!cfg)
return;
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ static inline void init_IO_APIC_traps(void)
* 0x80, because int 0x80 is hm, kind of importantish. ;)
*/
for_each_active_irq(irq) {
- cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+ cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
if (IO_APIC_IRQ(irq) && cfg && !cfg->vector) {
/*
* Hmm.. We don't have an entry for this,
@@ -2659,7 +2659,7 @@ early_param("disable_timer_pin_1", disable_timer_pin_setup);
*/
static inline void __init check_timer(void)
{
- struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_get_chip_data(0);
+ struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_cfg(0);
int node = cpu_to_node(0);
int apic1, pin1, apic2, pin2;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -2923,7 +2923,7 @@ int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node)
void arch_teardown_hwirq(unsigned int irq)
{
- struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+ struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
unsigned long flags;
free_remapped_irq(irq);
@@ -3052,7 +3052,7 @@ int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
if (!irq_offset)
write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
- setup_remapped_irq(irq, irq_get_chip_data(irq), chip);
+ setup_remapped_irq(irq, irq_cfg(irq), chip);
irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, chip, handle_edge_irq, "edge");
@@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ int default_setup_hpet_msi(unsigned int irq, unsigned int id)
hpet_msi_write(irq_get_handler_data(irq), &msg);
irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT);
- setup_remapped_irq(irq, irq_get_chip_data(irq), chip);
+ setup_remapped_irq(irq, irq_cfg(irq), chip);
irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, chip, handle_edge_irq, "edge");
return 0;
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-19 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-19 16:22 [Patch Part1 V2 00/29] use irqdomain to dynamically allocate IRQ for IOAPIC Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 01/29] x86, irq: update high address field when updating affinity for MSI IRQ Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 02/29] genirq, trivial: improve documentation to match current implementation Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 03/29] x86, mpparse: use pr_lvl() helper utilities to replace printk(KERN_LVL) Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 04/29] x86, mpparse: simplify arch/x86/include/asm/mpspec.h Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 05/29] x86, PCI, ACPI: use kmalloc_node() to optimize for performance Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 06/29] x86, acpi, irq: kill static function irq_to_gsi() Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 07/29] x86, ACPI, trivial: minor improvements to arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 08/29] x86, ACPI, irq: enhance error handling in function acpi_register_gsi() Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 09/29] x86, ACPI, irq: fix possible eror in GSI to IRQ mapping for legacy IRQ Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 10/29] x86, irq, trivial: minor improvements of IRQ related code Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 11/29] x86, ioapic: kill unused global variable timer_through_8259 Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 12/29] x86, ioapic: kill static variable nr_irqs_gsi Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 13/29] x86, ioapic: introduce helper utilities to walk ioapics and pins Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:22 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2014-05-19 16:22 ` [Patch Part1 V2 15/29] x86, irq: reorganize IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector() to prepare for irqdomain Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 16/29] x86, irq: introduce some helper utilities to improve readability Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 17/29] x86, ACPI, irq: consolidate algorithm of mapping (ioapic, pin) to IRQ number Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 18/29] x86, irq: introduce mechanisms to support dynamically allocate IRQ for IOAPIC Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 19/29] x86, irq: enhance mp_register_ioapic() to support irqdomain Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 20/29] x86, ACPI, irq: provide basic irqdomain support Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 21/29] x86, mpparse, " Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 22/29] x86, devicetree, irq: use common mechanism to support irqdomain Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 23/29] x86, SFI, irq: provide basic irqdomain support Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 24/29] x86, irq: introduce two helper functions to support irqdomain map operation Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 25/29] x86, irq, ACPI: use common irqdomain map interface to program IOAPIC pins Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 26/29] x86, irq, mpparse: " Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 27/29] x86, irq, SFI: " Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 28/29] x86, irq, devicetree: " Jiang Liu
2014-05-19 16:23 ` [Patch Part1 V2 29/29] x86, irq: clean up unused IOAPIC interface Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1400516594-11544-15-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).