linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Bjorn Helgaas' <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, 'Richard Zhu' <r65037@freescale.com>,
	'Mohit Kumar' <mohit.kumar@st.com>, 'Marek Vasut' <marex@denx.de>,
	'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@ti.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] PCI: designware: get rid of pci_scan_root_bus
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:32:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406190729.4590.8.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001201cfa6f5$52863840$f792a8c0$%han@samsung.com>

Hi Jingoo,

Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2014, 13:11 +0900 schrieb Jingoo Han:
> On Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:53 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > 
> > Use pci_create_root_bus() similar to other pci
> > host controller drivers.
> > 
> > The main problem with pci_scan_root_bus() is that
> > not only it will create the root bus, but also try
> > to activate all devices on the bus. This triggers
> > PCI device drivers probe, which try to use the device
> > but fail as resource allocation isn't done at that
> > point in time.
> > 
> > To work around this we made sure that the host
> > controller driver is probed early and finishes resource
> > allocation before any other device drivers are registered.
> > Switching to pci_create_root_bus() allows us to get rid
> > of this special handling.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 15 +++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > index b13a830c8b0f..b869e202367c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> > @@ -801,14 +801,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> >  	struct pci_bus *bus;
> >  	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
> > 
> > -	if (pp) {
> > -		pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
> > -		bus = pci_scan_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr, &dw_pcie_ops,
> > -					sys, &sys->resources);
> > -	} else {
> > -		bus = NULL;
> > -		BUG();
> > -	}
> > +	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
> > +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
> > +				  &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
> > +	if (!bus)
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> 
> 
> I think that we still need to check if pp is NULL.
> Then, how about adding NULL check as below?
> 
No I don't think it's needed as it doesn't provide any additional
security.

The only code path that is calling this dw_pci_scan_bus() is in
pcibios_init_hw() which always fills sys->private_data with
hw_pci->private_data. As we are always filling hw_pci->private_data with
a pointer to our pcie_port structure in dw_pcie_host_init() the only way
for pp to be NULL at this point would be for pp to be NULL in
dw_pcie_host_init(). This would obviously crash a lot earlier.

So this check is just adding to LOC without adding any value.

Regards,
Lucas

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.             | Lucas Stach                 |
Industrial Linux Solutions   | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-24  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-23 17:52 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: designware: init order/resource alloc fixes Lucas Stach
2014-07-23 17:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: designware: start parsing bus-range Lucas Stach
2014-08-16 12:26   ` Pratyush Anand
2014-09-03 18:37   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-07-23 17:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: designware: get rid of pci_scan_root_bus Lucas Stach
2014-07-24  4:11   ` Jingoo Han
2014-07-24  8:32     ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2014-07-24  8:55       ` Jingoo Han
2014-07-24  9:02         ` Lucas Stach
2014-07-25  0:39           ` Jingoo Han
2014-08-16 12:27   ` Pratyush Anand
2014-07-23 17:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: designware: remove pci_assign_unassigned_resources call Lucas Stach
2014-08-16 13:13   ` Pratyush Anand
2014-08-17  2:59     ` Yinghai Lu
2014-08-17  6:20       ` Pratyush Anand
2014-08-18 15:39         ` Murali Karicheri
2014-07-23 17:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: imx6: move to module_init Lucas Stach
2014-07-24  6:32   ` Hong-Xing.Zhu
2014-07-23 18:08 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI: designware: init order/resource alloc fixes Marek Vasut
2014-09-02 23:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-09-03  4:19   ` Mohit KUMAR DCG
2014-09-03 18:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1406190729.4590.8.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de \
    --to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=mohit.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=r65037@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).