linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC Part4 v1 09/17] x86, irq: Simplify MSI/DMAR/HPET implementation by using common code
Date: Sun,  9 Nov 2014 23:10:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415545839-28263-10-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415545839-28263-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>

Use common code to simplify MSI/DMAR/HPET driver implementation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c |   81 ++++----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
index 842d71699912..f625c2f21377 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
@@ -140,23 +140,6 @@ struct irq_domain *arch_create_msi_irq_domain(struct irq_domain *parent)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DMAR_TABLE
-static int
-dmar_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask,
-		      bool force)
-{
-	struct irq_data *parent = data->parent_data;
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, mask, force);
-	if (ret >= 0) {
-		irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(data, &msg);
-		dmar_msi_write(data->irq, &msg);
-	}
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static void dmar_msi_write_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
 {
 	dmar_msi_write(data->irq, msg);
@@ -167,7 +150,7 @@ static struct irq_chip dmar_msi_type = {
 	.irq_unmask		= dmar_msi_unmask,
 	.irq_mask		= dmar_msi_mask,
 	.irq_ack		= irq_chip_ack_parent,
-	.irq_set_affinity	= dmar_msi_set_affinity,
+	.irq_set_affinity	= msi_domain_set_affinity,
 	.irq_retrigger		= irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
 	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= msi_compose_msg,
 	.irq_write_msi_msg	= dmar_msi_write_msg,
@@ -205,29 +188,11 @@ static void dmar_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 	irq_domain_free_irqs_top(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
 }
 
-static void dmar_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
-				 struct irq_data *irq_data)
-{
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-
-	BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg));
-	dmar_msi_write(irq_data->irq, &msg);
-}
-
-static void dmar_domain_deactivate(struct irq_domain *domain,
-				   struct irq_data *irq_data)
-{
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-
-	memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
-	dmar_msi_write(irq_data->irq, &msg);
-}
-
 static struct irq_domain_ops dmar_domain_ops = {
 	.alloc = dmar_domain_alloc,
 	.free = dmar_domain_free,
-	.activate = dmar_domain_activate,
-	.deactivate = dmar_domain_deactivate,
+	.activate = msi_domain_activate,
+	.deactivate = msi_domain_deactivate,
 };
 
 static struct irq_domain *dmar_get_irq_domain(void)
@@ -277,22 +242,6 @@ static inline int hpet_dev_id(struct irq_domain *domain)
 	return (int)(long)domain->host_data;
 }
 
-static int hpet_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
-				 const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
-{
-	struct irq_data *parent = data->parent_data;
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, mask, force);
-	if (ret >= 0 && ret != IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE) {
-		irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(data, &msg);
-		hpet_msi_write(data->handler_data, &msg);
-	}
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static void hpet_msi_write_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
 {
 	hpet_msi_write(data->handler_data, msg);
@@ -303,7 +252,7 @@ static struct irq_chip hpet_msi_type = {
 	.irq_unmask = hpet_msi_unmask,
 	.irq_mask = hpet_msi_mask,
 	.irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent,
-	.irq_set_affinity = hpet_msi_set_affinity,
+	.irq_set_affinity = msi_domain_set_affinity,
 	.irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
 	.irq_compose_msi_msg = msi_compose_msg,
 	.irq_write_msi_msg = hpet_msi_write_msg,
@@ -343,29 +292,11 @@ static void hpet_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 	irq_domain_free_irqs_top(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
 }
 
-static void hpet_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
-				struct irq_data *irq_data)
-{
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-
-	BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg));
-	hpet_msi_write(irq_get_handler_data(irq_data->irq), &msg);
-}
-
-static void hpet_domain_deactivate(struct irq_domain *domain,
-				  struct irq_data *irq_data)
-{
-	struct msi_msg msg;
-
-	memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
-	hpet_msi_write(irq_get_handler_data(irq_data->irq), &msg);
-}
-
 static struct irq_domain_ops hpet_domain_ops = {
 	.alloc = hpet_domain_alloc,
 	.free = hpet_domain_free,
-	.activate = hpet_domain_activate,
-	.deactivate = hpet_domain_deactivate,
+	.activate = msi_domain_activate,
+	.deactivate = msi_domain_deactivate,
 };
 
 struct irq_domain *hpet_create_irq_domain(int hpet_id)
-- 
1.7.10.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-09 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-09 15:10 [RFC Part4 v1 00/17] Refine support of non-PCI-compliant Message Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 01/17] x86, irq: Normalize x86 irq_chip name Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 02/17] genirq: Introduce helper irq_domain_set_info() to reduce duplicated code Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 03/17] x86, PCI/MSI: Simplify the way to deal with remapped MSI interrupts Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 04/17] PCI/MSI: Replace msi_update_msg() with irq_chip_compose_msi_msg() Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 05/17] PCI/MSI: Move msi_set_affinity() to PCI core Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 06/17] genirq: Introduce callback irq_chip.irq_write_msi_msg Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 07/17] x86, irq: Implement irq_chip.irq_write_msi_msg for MSI/DMAR/HPET irq_chips Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 08/17] PCI/MSI: Use irq_chip.irq_write_msi_msg() to share common code Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 10/17] PCI, MSI: Split MSI code into PCI dependent and PCI independent parts Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 11/17] PCI, MSI: Rename __read_msi_msg() as __pci_read_msi_msg() Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 12/17] PCI, MSI: Rename __write_msi_msg() as __pci_write_msi_msg() Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 13/17] MSI: Provide irqdomain support for generic MSI Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 14/17] x86, PCI, MSI: Use common code to manage MSI interrupts Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 15/17] PCI, MSI: Clean up unused irqdomain related code Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 16/17] x86, htirq: Kill struct ht_irq_msg by reusing struct msi_msg Jiang Liu
2014-11-09 15:10 ` [RFC Part4 v1 17/17] x86, htirq: Use common MSI code to manage Hypertransport interrupts Jiang Liu
2014-11-12 13:47 ` [RFC Part4 v1 00/17] Refine support of non-PCI-compliant Message Marc Zyngier
2014-11-12 14:46   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-12 14:52     ` Jiang Liu
2014-11-13 11:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2014-11-13 13:27       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1415545839-28263-10-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).