Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
	wangyijing@huawei.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/19] powerpc: Create pci_controller_ops.dma_dev_setup and shim
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:31:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428463905.29968.2.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2489424.TEiBTfgpvS@wuerfel>

On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 09:44 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2015 10:31:36 Daniel Axtens wrote:
> > > Please see https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/431333/ for related work.
> > > 
> > I'm familiar with that patch series - I've been helping Yijing get it up
> > to speed on PowerPC.
> > 
> > 
> > > I think it would be better not to introduce another architecture-specific
> > > pci host bridge operations structure, but instead consolidate into
> > > the one that is already there. We are also adding a generic way to set up
> > > PCI DMA, so it would seems reasonable to hook into that place.
> > I see what you're getting at, and I agree that we want to move towards
> > generic operations. 
> > 
> > However, I think this should go in as is at this point, for two main
> > reasons:
> > 
> > 1) This is a good midpoint that makes it easier to move to a generic
> > structure. Our arch specific stuff is quirky and difficult. This patch
> > series does a lot to reduce the complexity, and would make it very easy
> > to move these ops into a generic structure at some future point. 
> > 
> > 2) Trying to go generic at this point risks making the change set so
> > complex and wide ranging that it will really struggle to get in. For
> > example, Yijing's patch set, despite not changing any of the quirky
> > stuff in PowerPC, is already quite long, and will require agreement from
> > a lot of people before it can go in.
> > 
> > Much as I would like to have everything as generic as possible, if we
> > were to try to do the whole job in one go, it'd become a big, difficult,
> > messy patch set, and would be less likely to happen than if we were to
> > do it in two steps.
> 
> Ok, fair enough. Let's do this one first then.

Thanks Arnd.

cheers



      reply	other threads:[~2015-04-08  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1427778057-9505-1-git-send-email-dja@axtens.net>
     [not found] ` <1427778057-9505-5-git-send-email-dja@axtens.net>
2015-04-02 14:13   ` [PATCH v2 04/19] powerpc: Create pci_controller_ops.dma_dev_setup and shim Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-07  0:31     ` Daniel Axtens
2015-04-07  7:44       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-08  3:31         ` Michael Ellerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1428463905.29968.2.camel@ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox