[RFC v1 05/11] mn10300: Fix incorrect use of data->affinity

[Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>]

The field affinity in struct irq_data is type of cpumask_var_t, so
we should pass in data->affinity instead of &data->affinity when
calling cpumask_xxxx().

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c
index 6ab3b73efcf8..480de70f4059 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c
@@ -320,11 +320,11 @@ void migrate_irqs(void)
 		if (irqd_is_per_cpu(data))
 			continue;
 
-		if (cpumask_test_cpu(self, &data->affinity) &&
+		if (cpumask_test_cpu(self, data->affinity) &&
 		    !cpumask_intersects(&irq_affinity[irq], cpu_online_mask)) {
 			int cpu_id;
 			cpu_id = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_id, &data->affinity);
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_id, data->affinity);
 		}
 		/* We need to operate irq_affinity_online atomically. */
 		arch_local_cli_save(flags);
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ void migrate_irqs(void)
 			GxICR(irq) = x & GxICR_LEVEL;
 			tmp = GxICR(irq);
 
-			new = cpumask_any_and(&data->affinity,
+			new = cpumask_any_and(data->affinity,
 					      cpu_online_mask);
 			irq_affinity_online[irq] = new;
 
-- 
1.7.10.4