From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Jiang Liu To: Thomas Gleixner , Bjorn Helgaas , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Randy Dunlap , Yinghai Lu , Borislav Petkov , David Howells , Koichi Yasutake , Jiang Liu Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Tony Luck , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com Subject: [Patch v3 13/36] mn10300: Fix incorrect use of data->affinity Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:05:22 +0800 Message-Id: <1433145945-789-14-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1433145945-789-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <1433145945-789-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: The field affinity in struct irq_data is type of cpumask_var_t, so we should pass in data->affinity instead of &data->affinity when calling cpumask_xxxx(). Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu --- arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c index 6ab3b73efcf8..480de70f4059 100644 --- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/irq.c @@ -320,11 +320,11 @@ void migrate_irqs(void) if (irqd_is_per_cpu(data)) continue; - if (cpumask_test_cpu(self, &data->affinity) && + if (cpumask_test_cpu(self, data->affinity) && !cpumask_intersects(&irq_affinity[irq], cpu_online_mask)) { int cpu_id; cpu_id = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_id, &data->affinity); + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu_id, data->affinity); } /* We need to operate irq_affinity_online atomically. */ arch_local_cli_save(flags); @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ void migrate_irqs(void) GxICR(irq) = x & GxICR_LEVEL; tmp = GxICR(irq); - new = cpumask_any_and(&data->affinity, + new = cpumask_any_and(data->affinity, cpu_online_mask); irq_affinity_online[irq] = new; -- 1.7.10.4