From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"x86 @ kernel . org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: [Bugfix v3] PCI, ACPI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 18:17:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435141065-28536-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150624094916.GA5696@gmail.com>
A regression report from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu>:
There's a Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 (PCI ID 10ec:8168, Subsystem ID 1565:230e)
network chip on the mainboard. After the r8169 driver loaded, the IRQs in
the machine went berserk. Keyboard keypressed arrived with considerable
latency and duplicated, so no real work was possible. The machine responded
to the power button but didn't actually power down. It just stuck at the
powering down message. I had to press the power button for 4 seconds to power
it down.
The computer is a POS machine with a big battery inside. Because of this,
either ACPI or the Realtek chip kept the bad state and after rebooting, the
network chip didn't even show up in lspci. Not even the PXE ROM announced
itself during boot. I had to disconnect the battery to beat some sense back
to the computer.
The regression happens with 4.0.5, 4.1.0-rc8 and 4.1.0-final. 3.18.16 was
good.
The regression is caused by commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common
ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation"). Since commit
593669c2ac0f, x86 PCI ACPI host bridge driver validates ACPI resources by
first converting an ACPI resource to a 'struct resource' structure and
then applying checks against the converted resource structure. The 'start'
and 'end' fields in 'struct resource' are defined to be type of
resource_size_t, which may be 32 bits or 64 bits depending on
CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT.
This may cause incorrect resource validation results with 32-bit kernels
because 64-bit ACPI resource descriptors may get truncated when converting
to 32-bit 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource'. It eventually
affects PCI resource allocation subsystem and makes some PCI devices and
the system behave abnormally due to incorrect resource assignment.
So enhance the ACPI resource parsing interfaces to ignore ACPI resource
descriptors with address/offset above 4G when running in 32-bit mode.
With the fix applied, the behavior of the machine was restored to how
3.18.16 worked, i.e. the memory range that is over 4GB is ignored again,
and lspci -vvxxx shows that everything is at the same memory window as
they were with 3.18.16.
Reported-by: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu>
Fixes: 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation")
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.0
---
Thanks, Ingo and Zoltan!
Will write bugfix commit messages for people who will backport them.
Thanks!
Gerry
---
drivers/acpi/resource.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
index 8244f013f210..f1c966e05078 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
u8 iodec = attr->granularity == 0xfff ? ACPI_DECODE_10 : ACPI_DECODE_16;
bool wp = addr->info.mem.write_protect;
u64 len = attr->address_length;
+ u64 start, end, offset = 0;
struct resource *res = &win->res;
/*
@@ -204,9 +205,6 @@ static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
pr_debug("ACPI: Invalid address space min_addr_fix %d, max_addr_fix %d, len %llx\n",
addr->min_address_fixed, addr->max_address_fixed, len);
- res->start = attr->minimum;
- res->end = attr->maximum;
-
/*
* For bridges that translate addresses across the bridge,
* translation_offset is the offset that must be added to the
@@ -214,12 +212,22 @@ static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
* primary side. Non-bridge devices must list 0 for all Address
* Translation offset bits.
*/
- if (addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER) {
- res->start += attr->translation_offset;
- res->end += attr->translation_offset;
- } else if (attr->translation_offset) {
+ if (addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)
+ offset = attr->translation_offset;
+ else if (attr->translation_offset)
pr_debug("ACPI: translation_offset(%lld) is invalid for non-bridge device.\n",
attr->translation_offset);
+ start = attr->minimum + offset;
+ end = attr->maximum + offset;
+
+ win->offset = offset;
+ res->start = start;
+ res->end = end;
+ if (sizeof(resource_size_t) < sizeof(u64) &&
+ (offset != win->offset || start != res->start || end != res->end)) {
+ pr_warn("acpi resource window ([%#llx-%#llx] ignored, not CPU addressable)\n",
+ attr->minimum, attr->maximum);
+ return false;
}
switch (addr->resource_type) {
@@ -236,8 +244,6 @@ static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
return false;
}
- win->offset = attr->translation_offset;
-
if (addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_WINDOW;
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-24 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-24 7:43 [Bugfix v2] PCI, ACPI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32bit kernel Jiang Liu
2015-06-24 8:25 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2015-06-24 11:00 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2015-06-24 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24 9:28 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2015-06-24 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-24 10:17 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-06-24 10:18 ` [Bugfix v3] PCI, ACPI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel Ingo Molnar
2015-06-29 8:55 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2015-06-29 14:28 ` Jiang Liu
2015-07-08 7:26 ` [Bugfix v4] " Jiang Liu
2015-07-10 1:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-02 15:27 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-11-05 12:53 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2015-11-05 13:24 ` Jiang Liu
2015-11-05 13:53 ` Tomasz Nowicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435141065-28536-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zboszor@pr.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).