From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, TJ <linux@iam.tj>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/49] PCI: Optimize bus align/size calculation during sizing
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:46:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436914040-13206-5-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436914040-13206-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Current code try to get align as small as possible and use that to
align final size. But it does not handle resource that size is bigger
than align in optimal way, kernel only use max align for them.
For example:
when we have resources with align/size: 1M/2M, 512M/512M,
bus resource min_align/size0 will be 512M/1024M,
but optimal value should be 256M/768M.
For following cases that we have resource size that is bigger
than resource alignment:
1. SRIOV bar.
2. PCI bridges with several bridges or devices as children.
We can keep on trying to allocate children devices resources under range
[half_align, half_align + aligned_size).
If sucesses, we can use that half_align as new min_align.
After this patch, we get:
align/size: 1M/2M, 2M/4M, 4M/8M, 8M/16M
new min_align/min_size: 4M/32M, and old is 8M/32M
align/size: 1M/2M, 2M/4M, 4M/8M
new min_align/min_size: 2M/14M, and old is 4M/16M
align/size: 1M/2M, 512M/512M
new min_align/min_size: 256M/768M, and old is 512M/1024M
The real result from one system with one pcie card that has
four functions that support sriov:
align/size:
00800000/00800000
00800000/00800000
00800000/00800000
00800000/00800000
00010000/00200000
00010000/00200000
00010000/00200000
00010000/00200000
00008000/00008000
00008000/00008000
00008000/00008000
00008000/00008000
00004000/00080000
00004000/00080000
00004000/00080000
00004000/00080000
old min_align/min_size: 00400000/02c00000
min_align/min_size: 00100000/02b00000
So align will be 1M instead of 4M.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81431
Reported-by: TJ <linux@iam.tj>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 157 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
index 27cb0f0..ecdf011 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
@@ -30,6 +30,34 @@
unsigned int pci_flags;
+static inline bool is_before(resource_size_t align1, resource_size_t size1,
+ resource_size_t align2, resource_size_t size2)
+{
+ resource_size_t size1_left, size2_left;
+
+ /* big align is before small align */
+ if (align1 > align2)
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * for same align:
+ * aligned is before not aligned
+ * for not aligned, big remainder is before small remainder
+ */
+ if (align1 == align2) {
+ size1_left = size1 & (align1 - 1);
+ if (!size1_left)
+ size1_left = align1;
+ size2_left = size2 & (align2 - 1);
+ if (!size2_left)
+ size2_left = align2;
+ if (size1_left > size2_left)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
struct pci_dev_resource {
struct list_head list;
struct resource *res;
@@ -999,26 +1027,125 @@ static void pbus_size_io(struct pci_bus *bus, resource_size_t min_size,
}
}
-static inline resource_size_t calculate_mem_align(resource_size_t *aligns,
- int max_order)
+struct align_test_res {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct resource res;
+ resource_size_t size;
+ resource_size_t align;
+};
+
+static void free_align_test_list(struct list_head *head)
{
- resource_size_t align = 0;
- resource_size_t min_align = 0;
- int order;
+ struct align_test_res *p, *tmp;
- for (order = 0; order <= max_order; order++) {
- resource_size_t align1 = 1;
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(p, tmp, head, list) {
+ list_del(&p->list);
+ kfree(p);
+ }
+}
- align1 <<= (order + 20);
+static int add_to_align_test_list(struct list_head *head,
+ resource_size_t align, resource_size_t size)
+{
+ struct align_test_res *tmp;
+
+ tmp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmp)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ tmp->align = align;
+ tmp->size = size;
+
+ list_add_tail(&tmp->list, head);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void __sort_align_test(struct list_head *head)
+{
+ struct align_test_res *res1, *tmp_res, *res2;
- if (!align)
- min_align = align1;
- else if (ALIGN(align + min_align, min_align) < align1)
- min_align = align1 >> 1;
- align += aligns[order];
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(res1, tmp_res, head, list) {
+ /* reorder it */
+ list_for_each_entry(res2, head, list) {
+ if (res2 == res1)
+ break;
+
+ if (is_before(res1->align, res1->size,
+ res2->align, res2->size)) {
+ list_move_tail(&res1->list, &res2->list);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static bool is_align_size_good(struct list_head *head,
+ resource_size_t min_align, resource_size_t size,
+ resource_size_t start)
+{
+ struct align_test_res *p;
+ struct resource root;
+
+ memset(&root, 0, sizeof(root));
+ root.start = start;
+ root.end = start + size - 1;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(p, head, list)
+ memset(&p->res, 0, sizeof(p->res));
+
+ list_for_each_entry(p, head, list)
+ if (allocate_resource(&root, &p->res, p->size,
+ 0, (resource_size_t)-1ULL,
+ p->align, NULL, NULL))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static resource_size_t calculate_mem_align(struct list_head *head,
+ resource_size_t max_align, resource_size_t size,
+ resource_size_t align_low)
+{
+ struct align_test_res *p;
+ resource_size_t min_align, good_align, aligned_size, start;
+ int count = 0;
+
+ if (max_align <= align_low) {
+ good_align = align_low;
+ goto out;
}
- return min_align;
+ good_align = max_align;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(p, head, list)
+ count++;
+
+ if (count <= 1)
+ goto out;
+
+ __sort_align_test(head);
+
+ do {
+ /* check if we can use smaller align */
+ min_align = good_align >> 1;
+ aligned_size = ALIGN(size, min_align);
+
+ /* need to make sure every offset work */
+ for (start = min_align; start < max_align; start += min_align) {
+ /* checked already with last align ? */
+ if (!(start & (good_align - 1)))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!is_align_size_good(head, min_align, aligned_size,
+ start))
+ goto out;
+ }
+ good_align = min_align;
+ } while (min_align > align_low);
+
+out:
+ return good_align;
}
/**
@@ -1048,19 +1175,17 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask,
{
struct pci_dev *dev;
resource_size_t min_align, align, size, size0, size1;
- resource_size_t aligns[18]; /* Alignments from 1Mb to 128Gb */
- int order, max_order;
+ resource_size_t max_align = 0;
struct resource *b_res = find_free_bus_resource(bus,
mask | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH, type);
resource_size_t children_add_size = 0;
resource_size_t children_add_align = 0;
resource_size_t add_align = 0;
+ LIST_HEAD(align_test_list);
if (!b_res)
return -ENOSPC;
- memset(aligns, 0, sizeof(aligns));
- max_order = 0;
size = 0;
list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
@@ -1086,29 +1211,20 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask,
continue;
}
#endif
- /*
- * aligns[0] is for 1MB (since bridge memory
- * windows are always at least 1MB aligned), so
- * keep "order" from being negative for smaller
- * resources.
- */
align = pci_resource_alignment(dev, r);
- order = __ffs(align) - 20;
- if (order < 0)
- order = 0;
- if (order >= ARRAY_SIZE(aligns)) {
+ if (align > (1ULL<<37)) { /*128 Gb*/
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "disabling BAR %d: %pR (bad alignment %#llx)\n",
- i, r, (unsigned long long) align);
+ i, r, (unsigned long long) align);
r->flags = 0;
continue;
}
+
+ if (r_size > 1)
+ add_to_align_test_list(&align_test_list,
+ align, r_size);
size += r_size;
- /* Exclude ranges with size > align from
- calculation of the alignment. */
- if (r_size == align)
- aligns[order] += align;
- if (order > max_order)
- max_order = order;
+ if (align > max_align)
+ max_align = align;
if (realloc_head) {
children_add_size += get_res_add_size(realloc_head, r);
@@ -1118,9 +1234,12 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask,
}
}
- min_align = calculate_mem_align(aligns, max_order);
- min_align = max(min_align, window_alignment(bus, b_res->flags));
- size0 = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res), min_align);
+ max_align = max(max_align, window_alignment(bus, b_res->flags));
+ min_align = calculate_mem_align(&align_test_list, max_align, size,
+ window_alignment(bus, b_res->flags));
+ size0 = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0,
+ resource_size(b_res), min_align);
+ free_align_test_list(&align_test_list);
add_align = max(min_align, add_align);
if (children_add_size > add_size)
add_size = children_add_size;
--
1.8.4.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-14 22:46 [PATCH v2 00/49] PCI: Resource allocation cleanup for v4.3 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/49] PCI: Cleanup res_to_dev_res() printout for addon resources Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/49] PCI: Reuse res_to_dev_res in reassign_resources_sorted Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/49] PCI: Use correct align for optional only resources during sorting Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/49] PCI: Optimize bus align/size calculation for optional during sizing Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/49] PCI: Don't add too much optional size for hotplug bridge mmio Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/49] PCI: Reorder resources list for must/optional resources Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/49] PCI: Remove duplicated code for resource sorting Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/49] PCI: Rename pdev_sort_resources to pdev_check_resources Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/49] PCI: Treat ROM resource as optional during realloc Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/49] PCI: Add debug printout during releasing partial assigned resources Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/49] PCI: Simplify res reference using in __assign_resourcs_sorted Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 13/49] PCI: Separate realloc list checking after allocation Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 14/49] PCI: Add __add_to_list() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 15/49] PCI: Cache window alignment value Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 16/49] PCI: Check if resource is allocated before pci_assign Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 17/49] PCI: Separate out save_resources/restore_resource Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 18/49] PCI: Move comment to pci_need_to_release() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 19/49] PCI: Separate must+optional assigning to another function Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 20/49] PCI: Skip must+optional if there is no optional addon Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 21/49] PCI: Move saved required resource list out of must+optional assigning Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 22/49] PCI: Add alt_size allocation support Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 23/49] PCI: Add support for more than two alt_size under same bridge Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 24/49] PCI: Better support for two alt_size Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 25/49] PCI: Don't add too much optional size for hotplug bridge io Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 26/49] PCI: Move ISA ioport align out of calculate_iosize Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 27/49] PCI: Unifiy calculate_size for io port and mmio Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 28/49] PCI: Allow optional only io resource must size to be 0 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 29/49] PCI: Unify skip_ioresource_align() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 30/49] PCI: Kill macro checking for bus io port sizing Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 31/49] resources: Split out __allocate_resource() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 32/49] resources: Make allocate_resource return just fit resource Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 33/49] PCI: Check pref compatible bit for mem64 resource of pcie device Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 34/49] PCI: Only treat non-pef mmio64 as pref if all bridges has MEM_64 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 35/49] PCI: Add has_mem64 for host_bridge Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 36/49] PCI: Only treat non-pef mmio64 as pref if host-bridge has_mem64 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 37/49] PCI: Restore pref mmio allocation logic for hostbridge without mmio64 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 38/49] sparc/PCI: Add mem64 resource parsing for root bus Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 39/49] sparc/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource in of parsing Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 40/49] powerpc/PCI: " Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 41/49] of/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 42/49] PCI: Treat optional as must in first try for bridge rescan Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 43/49] PCI: Get new realloc size for bridge for last try Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 44/49] PCI: Don't release sibiling bridge resources during hotplug Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 45/49] PCI: Don't release fixed resource for realloc Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 46/49] PCI: Set resource to FIXED for lsi devices Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 47/49] PCI, x86: Add pci=assign_pref_bars to re-allocate pref bars Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 48/49] PCI: Introduce resource_disabled() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-14 22:47 ` [PATCH v2 49/49] PCI: Don't set flags to 0 when assign resource fail Yinghai Lu
2015-07-17 1:51 ` [PATCH v2 00/49] PCI: Resource allocation cleanup for v4.3 Wei Yang
2015-07-17 3:59 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436914040-13206-5-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@iam.tj \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).