From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46759 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751156AbbGOHWB (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:22:01 -0400 Subject: RE: megaraid_sas: "FW in FAULT state!!", how to get more debug output? [BKO63661] From: Jean Delvare To: Kashyap Desai Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "Robin H. Johnson" , Adam Radford , Neela Syam Kolli , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, arkadiusz.bubala@open-e.com, Matthew Garrett , Sumit Saxena , Uday Lingala , "PDL,MEGARAIDLINUX" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Myron Stowe In-Reply-To: <775bb7e5ecc09c3f042ca8e949b35e5f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20150429172832.GB7888@google.com> <20150528122443.GI10210@google.com> <9e8b957da24d7b1f532ed83ffb86ca37@mail.gmail.com> <20150707104426.3d7e8697@endymion.delvare> <1436537115.4540.31.camel@chaos.site> <775bb7e5ecc09c3f042ca8e949b35e5f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:21:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1436944915.4661.5.camel@chaos.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le Friday 10 July 2015 à 19:46 +0530, Kashyap Desai a écrit : > > > > I am about to commit the patch that was successfully tested by the > > customer on > > SLES 12, but I'm a bit confused. The upstream patch you referred to is: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git/commit/?h=for- > > next&id=6431f5d7c6025f8b007af06ea090de308f7e6881 > > [SCSI] megaraid_sas: megaraid_sas driver init fails in kdump kernel > > > > But the patch I used is the one you sent by e-mail on May 28th. It is > > completely > > different! > > > > So what am I supposed to do? Use the patch you sent (and that was tested > > by the customer) for SLES 11 SP3 and SLES 12? Or was it just for testing > > and the proper way of fixing the problem would be to backport the >>upstream commit? > > You can use that patch as valid candidate for upstream submission. Some of > the MR maintainer (Sumit Saxena) will send that patch. We are just > organizing other patch series. > Since SLES already ported patch without commit id, we are fine. I am just > giving reference that patch which send via email will be send to upstream > very soon along with other patch set. OK, thanks for the clarification. The patched SLES 11 SP3 kernel is currently under testing by the customer, apparently it doesn't work but I don't have all the details yet. Maybe some more patches need to be backported because that kernel is older. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support