From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]:55226 "EHLO e23smtp01.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754459AbbKGXdD (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2015 18:33:03 -0500 Received: from localhost by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 09:33:01 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2838E2BB0051 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 10:33:00 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id tA7NWbh335258534 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 10:32:45 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id tA7NWRGh011131 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 10:32:27 +1100 From: Wei Yang To: gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bhelgaas@google.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, aik@ozlabs.ru Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yang Subject: [PATCH V13 6/9] powerpc/eeh: Create PE for VFs Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 07:30:32 +0800 Message-Id: <1446939035-2617-7-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1446939035-2617-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1446939035-2617-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: The patch creates PEs for VFs in the weak function pcibios_bus_add_device(). Those PEs for VFs are identified with newly introduced flag EEH_PE_VF so that we handle them differently during EEH recovery. Signed-off-by: Wei Yang --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 10 ++++++++-- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h index 6c383ad..ec21f8f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct pci_dn; #define EEH_PE_PHB (1 << 1) /* PHB PE */ #define EEH_PE_DEVICE (1 << 2) /* Device PE */ #define EEH_PE_BUS (1 << 3) /* Bus PE */ +#define EEH_PE_VF (1 << 4) /* VF PE */ #define EEH_PE_ISOLATED (1 << 0) /* Isolated PE */ #define EEH_PE_RECOVERING (1 << 1) /* Recovering PE */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c index 8654cb1..29240ad 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c @@ -299,7 +299,10 @@ static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev) * EEH device already having associated PE, but * the direct parent EEH device doesn't have yet. */ - pdn = pdn ? pdn->parent : NULL; + if (edev->physfn) + pdn = pci_get_pdn(edev->physfn); + else + pdn = pdn ? pdn->parent : NULL; while (pdn) { /* We're poking out of PCI territory */ parent = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); @@ -382,7 +385,10 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev) } /* Create a new EEH PE */ - pe = eeh_pe_alloc(edev->phb, EEH_PE_DEVICE); + if (edev->physfn) + pe = eeh_pe_alloc(edev->phb, EEH_PE_VF); + else + pe = eeh_pe_alloc(edev->phb, EEH_PE_DEVICE); if (!pe) { pr_err("%s: out of memory!\n", __func__); return -ENOMEM; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c index 3bb6acb..131c7d0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c @@ -1532,6 +1532,22 @@ static struct eeh_ops pnv_eeh_ops = { .restore_config = pnv_eeh_restore_config }; +void pcibios_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev); + + if (!pdev->is_virtfn) + return; + + /* + * The following operations will fail if VF's sysfs files + * aren't created or its resources aren't finalized. + */ + eeh_add_device_early(pdn); + eeh_add_device_late(pdev); + eeh_sysfs_add_device(pdev); +} + /** * eeh_powernv_init - Register platform dependent EEH operations * -- 2.5.0