From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't allow vfio drivers to bind on driver_attach
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:06:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452636370.9674.47.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452634390-17729-1-git-send-email-jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 13:33 -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
> This patch is an attempt to resolve an issue which can occur when using
> vfio-pci (and vfio-platform) with IOMMU direct assignment.
>
> When attempting to directly assign a device to a virtual machine, the
> normal flow is something like the following:
>
> echo > /sys/bus/pci/drivers//unbind
> echo > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/vfio-pci/new_id
> echo > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/vfio-pci/bind
>
> This process results in the device being bound to the vfio-pci stub
> driver, and then this device can be safely given to a virtual machine.
>
> The issue can occur, that if doesn't currently have a driver
> loaded, (like say the module was removed), the process of adding
> can result in *all* devices which match that id being bound to
> vfio-pci. This may not seem like a problem, but it can be confusing when
> you have a dual-port device, such as a networking card. In some use
> cases, you only want to assign a single port to a VM and not all the
> ports. If you happen to not have the driver loaded already, the result
> is that even loading the driver later will not gain control of the 2nd
> port, because the device is already bound to vfio-pci. The solution (if
> you know this is the case) would be to unbind that particular device
> from vfio and bind it to the real driver.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by instead requiring vfio-pci and
> vfio-platform to only bind to devices given via the sysfs bind route,
> and prevents bind to any devices in other scenarios. The result is that
> vfio-pci will never bind a device unless explicitly requested. Given the
> nature of what vfio-pci does, I think this is a much better solution.
>
> I've tried to Cc several people who've made changes to this area of th
> kernel for more feedback.
We already have a solution in the kernel for this, it's the
driver_override interface. Rather than your above example of adding a
new ID to the dynamic list for the driver, such that it will
automatically probe the device, we reverse the process to allow the
device to match the driver. The sequence becomes:
echo vfio-pci > /sys/bus/pci/devices/<pci address>/driver_override
echo <pci address> > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/<old driver>/unbind
echo <pci address> /sys/bus/pci/drivers_probe
The old interface is kept around because there are quite a few users of
it, some of which would be broken by the proposed manual_bind_only code
change, including the example of using driver_override above. This
also avoids even the need for pci-stub (which has the same issue),
since we can simply put a dummy name in driver_override to avoid a
device from matching any driver. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-12 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-12 21:33 [PATCH] don't allow vfio drivers to bind on driver_attach Jacob Keller
2016-01-12 21:33 ` [PATCH] driver: add manual_bind_only option for virtual stub drivers Jacob Keller
2016-01-12 21:53 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-13 0:02 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-12 22:06 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2016-01-12 22:25 ` [PATCH] don't allow vfio drivers to bind on driver_attach Keller, Jacob E
2016-01-12 22:43 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452636370.9674.47.camel@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).