linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com,
	lenb@kernel.org, harish.k@hpe.com, ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements
Date: Tue,  8 Mar 2016 19:41:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1457484079-18202-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Code has been redesigned to calculate penalty requirements on the fly. This
significantly simplifies the implementation and removes some of the init
calls from x86 architecture.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index ededa90..a5a66ca 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
@@ -440,7 +442,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
 #define ACPI_MAX_IRQS		256
 #define ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ	16
 
-#define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE	(0)
 #define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE	(16*16)
 #define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING		(16*16*16)
 #define PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL	(16*16*16*16)
@@ -457,9 +458,9 @@ static int acpi_irq_penalty[ACPI_MAX_IRQS] = {
 	PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL,	/* IRQ6 */
 	PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL,	/* IRQ7 parallel, spurious */
 	PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL,	/* IRQ8 rtc, sometimes */
-	PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE,	/* IRQ9  PCI, often acpi */
-	PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE,	/* IRQ10 PCI */
-	PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE,	/* IRQ11 PCI */
+	0,				/* IRQ9  PCI, often acpi */
+	0,				/* IRQ10 PCI */
+	0,				/* IRQ11 PCI */
 	PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED,		/* IRQ12 mouse */
 	PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED,		/* IRQ13 fpe, sometimes */
 	PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED,		/* IRQ14 ide0 */
@@ -467,6 +468,49 @@ static int acpi_irq_penalty[ACPI_MAX_IRQS] = {
 	/* >IRQ15 */
 };
 
+static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
+{
+	struct acpi_pci_link *link;
+	int penalty = 0;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
+		/*
+		 * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
+		 * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
+		 */
+		if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
+			penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+		else {
+			int i;
+
+			/*
+			 * If a link is inactive, penalize the IRQs it
+			 * might use, but not as severely.
+			 */
+			for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++)
+				if (link->irq.possible[i] == irq)
+					penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
+						link->irq.possible_count;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return penalty;
+}
+
+static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
+{
+	int penalty = 0;
+
+	if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ)
+		penalty += acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
+
+	if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt)
+		penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+
+	penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
+	return penalty;
+}
+
 int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
 {
 	struct acpi_pci_link *link;
@@ -568,7 +612,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
 			    acpi_device_bid(link->device));
 		return -ENODEV;
 	} else {
-		acpi_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
 		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
 		       acpi_device_name(link->device),
 		       acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active);
@@ -787,23 +830,24 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
 		int retval;
 		int irq;
+		int new_penalty;
 
 		retval = get_option(&str, &irq);
 
 		if (!retval)
 			break;	/* no number found */
 
-		if (irq < 0)
-			continue;
-
-		if (irq >= ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty))
+		/* see if this is a ISA IRQ */
+		if ((irq < 0) || (irq >= ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ))
 			continue;
 
 		if (used)
-			acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
+			new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+					PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
 		else
-			acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE;
+			new_penalty = 0;
 
+		acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = new_penalty;
 		if (retval != 2)	/* no next number */
 			break;
 	}
@@ -819,12 +863,9 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
  */
 void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
 {
-	if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
-		if (active)
-			acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
-		else
-			acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
-	}
+	if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)))
+		acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = active ?
+			PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
 }
 
 bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
@@ -840,13 +881,6 @@ bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
  */
 void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
 {
-	if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
-		if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
-		    polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
-			acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
-		else
-			acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
-	}
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.8.2.1


             reply	other threads:[~2016-03-09  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-09  0:41 Sinan Kaya [this message]
2016-03-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] acpi,pci,irq: remove redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init Sinan Kaya
2016-03-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] acpi,pci,irq: remove SCI penalize function Sinan Kaya
2016-03-09  0:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] Revert "Revert "ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction"" Sinan Kaya
2016-03-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-14 20:37   ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-14 21:01     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-14 21:50       ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-15  1:48         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-15  2:28           ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-15  2:36             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-15 13:33               ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-20 18:17                 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-04-05 23:21                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-09  1:28                     ` Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1457484079-18202-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=harish.k@hpe.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).