From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lawrynowicz, Jacek" <jacek.lawrynowicz@intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] PCI: Add support for multiple DMA aliases
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:43:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1457995420.78634.63.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160225143841.GA8726@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3109 bytes --]
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 08:38 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > /*
> > - * Look for aliases to or from the given device for exisiting groups. The
> > - * dma_alias_devfn only supports aliases on the same bus, therefore the search
> > + * Look for aliases to or from the given device for existing groups. DMA
> > + * aliases are only supported on the same bus, therefore the search
>
> I'm trying to reconcile this statement that "DMA aliases are only
> supported on the same bus" (which was there even before this patch)
> with the fact that pci_for_each_dma_alias() does not have that
> limitation.
Doesn't it? You can still only set a DMA alias on the same bus with
pci_add_dma_alias(), can't you?
> > * space is quite small (especially since we're really only looking at pcie
> > * device, and therefore only expect multiple slots on the root complex or
> > * downstream switch ports). It's conceivable though that a pair of
> > @@ -686,11 +692,8 @@ static struct iommu_group *get_pci_alias_group(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > continue;
> >
> > /* We alias them or they alias us */
> > - if (((pdev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_DEVFN) &&
> > - pdev->dma_alias_devfn == tmp->devfn) ||
> > - ((tmp->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_DEVFN) &&
> > - tmp->dma_alias_devfn == pdev->devfn)) {
> > -
> > + if (dma_alias_is_enabled(pdev, tmp->devfn) ||
> > + dma_alias_is_enabled(tmp, pdev->devfn)) {
> > group = get_pci_alias_group(tmp, devfns);
>
> We basically have this:
>
> for_each_pci_dev(tmp) {
> if ()
> group = get_pci_alias_group();
> ...
> }
Strictly, that's:
for_each_pci_dev(tmp) {
if (pdev is an alias of tmp || tmp is an alias of pdev)
group = get_pci_alias_group();
...
}
> The DMA alias stuff relies on PCI internals, so it doesn't doesn't
> seem quite right to use things like PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_DEVFN and
> dma_alias_devfn here in the IOMMU code.
>
> I'm trying to figure out why we don't do something like the following
> instead:
>
> callback(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *opaque)
> {
> struct iommu_group *group;
>
> group = get_pci_alias_group();
> if (group)
> return group;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> pci_for_each_dma_alias(pdev, callback, ...);
And this would be equivalent to
for_each_pci_dev(tmp) {
if (tmp is an alias of pdev)
group = get_pci_alias_group();
...
}
The "is an alias of" property is not commutative. Perhaps it should be.
But that's hard because in some cases the alias doesn't even *exist* as
a real PCI device. It's just that you appear to get DMA transactions
from a given source-id.
--
dwmw2
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5691 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-24 19:43 [PATCH v4 0/6] PCI: Support multiple DMA aliases Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-24 19:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] PCI: Add pci_add_dma_alias() to abstract implementation Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-08 20:18 ` Alex Williamson
2016-02-24 19:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] PCI: Move informational printk to pci_add_dma_alias() Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-08 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2016-02-24 19:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] PCI: Add support for multiple DMA aliases Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-25 14:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-25 15:41 ` Lawrynowicz, Jacek
2016-02-29 22:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-01 16:57 ` Jacek Lawrynowicz
2016-03-03 14:22 ` [PATCH] " Jacek Lawrynowicz
2016-03-03 14:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] " Jacek Lawrynowicz
2016-04-08 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2016-03-14 22:43 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2016-03-16 0:48 ` [PATCH v4 " Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-08 16:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-08 16:09 ` David Woodhouse
2016-04-08 17:31 ` Alex Williamson
2016-02-24 19:44 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] PCI: Rename dma_alias_is_enabled() to pci_devs_are_dma_aliases() Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-08 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2016-02-24 19:44 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] pci: Add DMA alias quirk for mic_x200_dma Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-03 14:53 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] PCI: " Jacek Lawrynowicz
2016-04-08 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2016-02-24 19:44 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] PCI: Squash pci_dev_flags to remove holes Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-08 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2016-04-12 4:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] PCI: Support multiple DMA aliases Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-12 16:20 ` Lawrynowicz, Jacek
2016-04-12 18:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1457995420.78634.63.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacek.lawrynowicz@intel.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).