From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, Richard.Zhu@freescale.com, khalasa@piap.pl,
ynezz@true.cz, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, tharvey@gateworks.com,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "PCI: imx6: Add support for active-low reset GPIO"
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:29:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459344542.2565.44.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459201536-5558-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com>
Am Montag, den 28.03.2016, 18:45 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
>
> Commit 5c5fb40de8f14 ("PCI: imx6: Add support for active-low reset GPIO")
> cause regressions on some boards like MX6 Gateworks Ventana, for example.
>
> The reason for the breakage is that this commit sets the gpio polarity
> in the wrong logic level.
>
> Also, the commit log is wrong because active-low reset GPIO is what the
> driver used to support since the beginning.
>
> So keep the old behavior that ignores the gpio polarity specified in
> the device tree and treat the PCI reset GPIO as active-low.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.5
> Reported-by: Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@piap.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
We need to keep compatibility to existing DTs that are setting the GPIO
active polarity in the wrong way, so this revert is correct:
Acked-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Improve wording of commit log (Tim)
>
> drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> index eb5a275..2f817fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
> #define to_imx6_pcie(x) container_of(x, struct imx6_pcie, pp)
>
> struct imx6_pcie {
> - struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
> + int reset_gpio;
> struct clk *pcie_bus;
> struct clk *pcie_phy;
> struct clk *pcie;
> @@ -309,10 +309,10 @@ static int imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct pcie_port *pp)
> usleep_range(200, 500);
>
> /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */
> - if (imx6_pcie->reset_gpio) {
> - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, 0);
> + if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) {
> + gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, 0);
> msleep(100);
> - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, 1);
> + gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, 1);
> }
> return 0;
>
> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ static int __init imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie;
> struct pcie_port *pp;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct resource *dbi_base;
> struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> int ret;
> @@ -544,8 +545,15 @@ static int __init imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(pp->dbi_base);
>
> /* Fetch GPIOs */
> - imx6_pcie->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "reset",
> - GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + imx6_pcie->reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "reset-gpio", 0);
> + if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, imx6_pcie->reset_gpio,
> + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "PCIe reset");
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to get reset gpio\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
>
> /* Fetch clocks */
> imx6_pcie->pcie_phy = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pcie_phy");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-30 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-28 21:45 [PATCH v2] Revert "PCI: imx6: Add support for active-low reset GPIO" Fabio Estevam
2016-03-29 13:43 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-30 12:21 ` Petr Štetiar
2016-03-30 12:36 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-30 13:00 ` Petr Štetiar
2016-03-30 13:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-30 13:16 ` Petr Štetiar
2016-03-30 13:20 ` Lucas Stach
2016-03-30 13:25 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-31 5:07 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-31 10:35 ` Lucas Stach
2016-04-01 7:26 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-30 13:29 ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2016-04-05 19:10 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-04-05 21:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-05 22:07 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-04-18 2:41 ` Fabio Estevam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459344542.2565.44.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=Richard.Zhu@freescale.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
--cc=ynezz@true.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).