linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
To: "Krzysztof Hałasa" <khalasa@piap.pl>
Cc: "Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"Petr Štetiar" <ynezz@true.cz>,
	"Tim Harvey" <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Richard Zhu" <Richard.Zhu@freescale.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "PCI: imx6: Add support for active-low reset GPIO"
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:35:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459420555.17926.6.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3h9fni6be.fsf@t19.piap.pl>

Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2016, 07:07 +0200 schrieb Krzysztof Hałasa:
> Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > In order to make the Toradex board to work without breaking old dtb's
> > is to introduce a property like 'phy-reset-active-high' and handle it
> > in the driver.
> 
> Well, I don't know. Most DTBs are distributed along the kernel on the
> same boot medium. Both ways are far from the ideal. Reverting for now is
> ok, but long-term I'd rather fix the buggy DTSs and remove extra stuff.
> 
> Old DTBs aren't compatible with new kernels anyway and I guess it will
> be the case in the future again (e.g. IIRC pre-4.2 IMX6 DTBs don't boot
> on 4.2+ - or was it 4.1?).

Sorry, but I strongly object to the argument of "DTs are not stable
anyways, so we might just continue to break them". We are trying to keep
them stable.

I think you are referring to the GPC interrupt domain change with your
above statement about DT stability breaking on 4.1/4.2. This is not the
case. While I only catched the boot regression in the -rc phase of this
kernel, the final released kernel will boot just fine with an old DTB.

The i.MX platform tries to keep DTs stable. No exceptions.

Regards,
Lucas


  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-31 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-28 21:45 [PATCH v2] Revert "PCI: imx6: Add support for active-low reset GPIO" Fabio Estevam
2016-03-29 13:43 ` Tim Harvey
2016-03-30 12:21   ` Petr Štetiar
2016-03-30 12:36     ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-30 13:00       ` Petr Štetiar
2016-03-30 13:07         ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-30 13:16           ` Petr Štetiar
2016-03-30 13:20             ` Lucas Stach
2016-03-30 13:25               ` Fabio Estevam
2016-03-31  5:07       ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-31 10:35         ` Lucas Stach [this message]
2016-04-01  7:26           ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-03-30 13:29 ` Lucas Stach
2016-04-05 19:10   ` Fabio Estevam
2016-04-05 21:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-05 22:07   ` Fabio Estevam
2016-04-18  2:41   ` Fabio Estevam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1459420555.17926.6.camel@pengutronix.de \
    --to=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Richard.Zhu@freescale.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
    --cc=ynezz@true.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).