From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lucky1.263xmail.com ([211.157.147.132]:43089 "EHLO lucky1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751374AbcFVDeP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:34:15 -0400 From: Shawn Lin To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Lin Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Simplify the return value of arch_setup_msi_irqs Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:20:20 +0800 Message-Id: <1466565620-27183-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: No any callers do care whether arch_setup_msi_irqs returns -ENOSPC or other error numbers. That means they treat the negative numbers in the same way. So there shouldn't make any difference to directly return -ENOSPC if finding it's non-zero. Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin --- Changes in v2: - fix warning generated by -Wmisleading-indentation reported by Kbuild robot drivers/pci/msi.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c index a080f44..5057219 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) { struct msi_controller *chip = dev->bus->msi; struct msi_desc *entry; - int ret; + int ret = 0; if (chip && chip->setup_irqs) return chip->setup_irqs(chip, dev, nvec, type); @@ -121,9 +121,7 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type) for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) { ret = arch_setup_msi_irq(dev, entry); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - if (ret > 0) + if (ret) return -ENOSPC; } -- 2.3.7