From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wim@djo.tudelft.nl,
perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct ISA penalty calculation
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 04:27:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467188859-28188-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Since commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
the penalty values are calculated on the fly rather than boot time.
This works fine for PCI interrupts but not so well for the ISA interrupts.
Whether an ISA interrupt is in use or not information is not available
inside the pci_link.c file. This information gets sent externally via
acpi_penalize_isa_irq function. If active is true, then the IRQ is in use
by ISA. Otherwise, IRQ is in use by PCI.
Sinan Kaya (4):
ACPI,PCI,IRQ: factor in PCI possible
Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove redundant code in
acpi_irq_penalty_init()"
ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation
ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 1 +
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
1.8.2.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-29 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-29 8:27 Sinan Kaya [this message]
2016-06-29 8:27 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: factor in PCI possible Sinan Kaya
2016-06-29 13:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-29 18:47 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-29 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-29 21:21 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-29 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-29 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-29 8:27 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()" Sinan Kaya
2016-06-29 8:27 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation Sinan Kaya
2016-10-18 10:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-18 16:10 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-29 8:27 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence Sinan Kaya
2016-06-29 13:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-29 18:29 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-29 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-29 21:19 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-29 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467188859-28188-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=wim@djo.tudelft.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).