From: Mayurkumar Patel <mayurkumar.patel@intel.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: rajatja@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
luis.antonio.tarazona-duarte@intel.com, keith.busch@intel.com,
mayurkumar.patel@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Fix presence detect change interrupt handling
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:07:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471554479-42083-1-git-send-email-mayurkumar.patel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92EBB4272BF81E4089A7126EC1E7B28466597350@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
Currently, if very fast hotplug removal and insertion event comes
as following
[ 608.823412] pciehp 0000:00:1c.1:pcie04: Card not present on Slot(1)
[ 608.835249] pciehp 0000:00:1c.1:pcie04: Card present on Slot(1)
In this case following scenario happens,
While removal:
pcie_isr() -> pciehp_queue_interrupt_event() -> triggers queue_work().
work invokes interrupt_event_handler() -> case INT_PRESENCE_OFF
and calls handle_surprise_event().
handle_surprise_event() again calls pciehp_get_adapter_status()
and reads slot status which might have been changed
already due to PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC event for hotplug insertion
has happened. So it queues, ENABLE_REQ for both removal
and insertion interrupt based on latest slot status.
In this case, PCIe device can not be hot-add again because
it was never removed due to which device can not get enabled.
handle_surprise_event() can be removed and pciehp_queue_power_work()
can be directly triggered based on INT_PRESENCE_ON and INT_PRESENCE_OFF
from the switch case exist in interrupt_event_hanlder().
The patch ensures the pciehp_queue_power_work() processes
presence detect change for removal and insertion correctly.
Signed-off-by: Mayurkumar Patel <mayurkumar.patel@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c | 18 ++----------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
index 880978b..87c5bea 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
@@ -301,20 +301,6 @@ static void handle_button_press_event(struct slot *p_slot)
/*
* Note: This function must be called with slot->lock held
*/
-static void handle_surprise_event(struct slot *p_slot)
-{
- u8 getstatus;
-
- pciehp_get_adapter_status(p_slot, &getstatus);
- if (!getstatus)
- pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, DISABLE_REQ);
- else
- pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, ENABLE_REQ);
-}
-
-/*
- * Note: This function must be called with slot->lock held
- */
static void handle_link_event(struct slot *p_slot, u32 event)
{
struct controller *ctrl = p_slot->ctrl;
@@ -377,14 +363,14 @@ static void interrupt_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
pciehp_green_led_off(p_slot);
break;
case INT_PRESENCE_ON:
- handle_surprise_event(p_slot);
+ pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, ENABLE_REQ);
break;
case INT_PRESENCE_OFF:
/*
* Regardless of surprise capability, we need to
* definitely remove a card that has been pulled out!
*/
- handle_surprise_event(p_slot);
+ pciehp_queue_power_work(p_slot, DISABLE_REQ);
break;
case INT_LINK_UP:
case INT_LINK_DOWN:
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 13:42 [PATCH v1] PCI: pciehp: Fix presence detect change interrupt handling Patel, Mayurkumar
2016-08-17 17:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-17 17:54 ` Rajat Jain
2016-08-17 18:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-17 22:37 ` Patel, Mayurkumar
2016-08-18 12:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-18 20:59 ` Patel, Mayurkumar
2016-08-23 23:47 ` Rajat Jain
2016-08-24 9:00 ` Patel, Mayurkumar
2016-09-01 10:44 ` Patel, Mayurkumar
2016-08-24 14:59 ` Keith Busch
2016-08-18 21:07 ` Mayurkumar Patel [this message]
2016-08-18 21:07 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] PCI: pciehp: Rework hotplug interrupt routine Mayurkumar Patel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-23 8:58 [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Fix presence detect change interrupt handling Patel, Mayurkumar
2016-09-08 19:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1471554479-42083-1-git-send-email-mayurkumar.patel@intel.com \
--to=mayurkumar.patel@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis.antonio.tarazona-duarte@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).