linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	bhelgaas@google.com, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com,
	linux@rainbow-software.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
	cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, wim@djo.tudelft.nl,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:21:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476915664-27231-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476915664-27231-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>

The penalty determination of ISA IRQ goes through 4 paths.
1. assign PCI_USING during power up via acpi_irq_penalty_init.
2. update the penalty with acpi_penalize_isa_irq function based on the
active parameter.
3. kernel command line penalty update via acpi_irq_penalty_update function.
4. increment the penalty as USING right after the IRQ is assign to PCI.

acpi_penalize_isa_irq and acpi_irq_penalty_update functions get called
before the ACPI subsystem is started.

These API need to bypass the acpi_irq_get_penalty function.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index c983bf7..4f37938 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 			continue;
 
 		if (used)
-			new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+			new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
 					PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
 		else
 			new_penalty = 0;
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
 void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
 {
 	if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
-		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+		acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
 		  (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-19 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-19 22:21 [PATCH V4 0/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-19 22:21 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2016-10-20 21:39   ` [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-24  3:48     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-21  1:39   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21 14:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24  3:22     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-23  3:48   ` [V4, " Jonathan Liu
2016-10-24  4:17     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-24  4:21       ` Jonathan Liu
2016-10-19 22:21 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-21  1:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21 14:45     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21 16:13       ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-22 14:57         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24  3:48         ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-22 23:28     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24  3:48     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-23  3:49   ` [V4,2/3] " Jonathan Liu
2016-10-19 22:21 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-21  2:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21  2:58     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-22 23:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24  4:16         ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-23  3:49   ` [V4,3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: " Jonathan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476915664-27231-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
    --cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=wim@djo.tudelft.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).