From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Michal Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Matt Roper" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] PCI: Allow drivers to control VF BAR size
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 13:20:58 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14a7c29e-31b9-2954-9142-0d1c49988b07@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250402141122.2818478-6-michal.winiarski@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5670 bytes --]
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> Drivers could leverage the fact that the VF BAR MMIO reservation is
> created for total number of VFs supported by the device by resizing the
> BAR to larger size when smaller number of VFs is enabled.
>
> Add a pci_iov_vf_bar_set_size() function to control the size and a
> pci_iov_vf_bar_get_sizes() helper to get the VF BAR sizes that will
> allow up to num_vfs to be successfully enabled with the current
> underlying reservation size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/iov.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 6 ++++
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> index 2fafbd6a998f0..8a62049b56b41 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> @@ -1313,3 +1313,72 @@ int pci_sriov_configure_simple(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn)
> return nr_virtfn;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_sriov_configure_simple);
> +
> +/**
> + * pci_iov_vf_bar_set_size - set a new size for a VF BAR
> + * @dev: the PCI device
> + * @resno: the resource number
> + * @size: new size as defined in the spec (0=1MB, 31=128TB)
> + *
> + * Set the new size of a VF BAR that supports VF resizable BAR capability.
> + * Unlike pci_resize_resource(), this does not cause the resource that
> + * reserves the MMIO space (originally up to total_VFs) to be resized, which
> + * means that following calls to pci_enable_sriov() can fail if the resources
> + * no longer fit.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, or negative on failure.
> + */
> +int pci_iov_vf_bar_set_size(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, int size)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 sizes;
Please reverse the order of these variables.
> +
> + if (!pci_resource_is_iov(resno))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (pci_iov_is_memory_decoding_enabled(dev))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + sizes = pci_rebar_get_possible_sizes(dev, resno);
> + if (!sizes)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (!(sizes & BIT(size)))
Add include for BIT().
Although adding a helper like this would be helpful for multiple callers:
@@ -3780,6 +3780,88 @@ u32 pci_rebar_get_possible_sizes(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_rebar_get_possible_sizes);
+/**
+ * pci_rebar_size_supported - check if size is supported for a resizable BAR
+ * @pdev: PCI device
+ * @bar: BAR to check
+ * @size: size as defined in the spec (0=1MB, 31=128TB)
+ *
+ * Return: %0 if @size is supported for @bar,
+ * %-EINVAL if @size is not supported,
+ * %-ENOTSUPP if @bar is not resizable.
+ */
+int pci_rebar_size_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, int size)
+{
+ u64 sizes;
+
+ sizes = pci_rebar_get_possible_sizes(pdev, bar);
+ if (!sizes)
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+
+ return BIT(size) & sizes ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_rebar_size_supported);
(Yes, I've some rebar helpers pending so this is extract from that.)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = pci_rebar_set_size(dev, resno, size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + pci_iov_resource_set_size(dev, resno, pci_rebar_size_to_bytes(size));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iov_vf_bar_set_size);
> +
> +/**
> + * pci_iov_vf_bar_get_sizes - get VF BAR sizes allowing to create up to num_vfs
> + * @dev: the PCI device
> + * @resno: the resource number
> + * @num_vfs: number of VFs
> + *
> + * Get the sizes of a VF resizable BAR that can accommodate @num_vfs within
> + * the currently assigned size of the resource @resno.
> + *
> + * Return: A bitmask of sizes in format defined in the spec (bit 0=1MB,
> + * bit 31=128TB).
> + */
> +u32 pci_iov_vf_bar_get_sizes(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, int num_vfs)
> +{
> + resource_size_t vf_len = pci_resource_len(dev, resno);
> + u32 sizes;
> +
> + if (!num_vfs)
> + return 0;
> +
> + do_div(vf_len, num_vfs);
Add include for do_div().
> + sizes = (roundup_pow_of_two(vf_len + 1) - 1) >> ilog2(SZ_1M);
Doesn't resource_size() already do that + 1 so why is a second one needed
here?
Add include for ilog() and SZ_*.
> +
> + return sizes & pci_rebar_get_possible_sizes(dev, resno);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iov_vf_bar_get_sizes);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 0e8e3fd77e967..c8708f3749757 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -2389,6 +2389,8 @@ int pci_sriov_set_totalvfs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 numvfs);
> int pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> int pci_sriov_configure_simple(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn);
> resource_size_t pci_iov_resource_size(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno);
> +int pci_iov_vf_bar_set_size(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, int size);
> +u32 pci_iov_vf_bar_get_sizes(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, int num_vfs);
> void pci_vf_drivers_autoprobe(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe);
>
> /* Arch may override these (weak) */
> @@ -2441,6 +2443,10 @@ static inline int pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(struct pci_dev *dev)
> #define pci_sriov_configure_simple NULL
> static inline resource_size_t pci_iov_resource_size(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
> { return 0; }
> +static inline int pci_iov_vf_bar_set_size(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, int size)
> +{ return -ENODEV; }
> +static inline u32 pci_iov_vf_bar_get_sizes(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, int num_vfs)
> +{ return 0; }
> static inline void pci_vf_drivers_autoprobe(struct pci_dev *dev, bool probe) { }
> #endif
>
>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 14:11 [PATCH v7 0/6] PCI: VF resizable BAR Michał Winiarski
2025-04-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] PCI/IOV: Restore VF resizable BAR state after reset Michał Winiarski
2025-04-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] PCI: Add a helper to convert between VF BAR number and IOV resource Michał Winiarski
2025-04-03 9:24 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] PCI: Allow IOV resources to be resized in pci_resize_resource() Michał Winiarski
2025-04-03 9:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] PCI/IOV: Check that VF BAR fits within the reservation Michał Winiarski
2025-04-03 9:54 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] PCI: Allow drivers to control VF BAR size Michał Winiarski
2025-04-03 10:20 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2025-05-26 21:54 ` Michał Winiarski
2025-04-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] drm/xe/pf: Set VF LMEM " Michał Winiarski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14a7c29e-31b9-2954-9142-0d1c49988b07@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox