linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 3/7] phy: rockcip-pcie: reconstruct driver to support per-lane PHYs
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:22:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500448979-93067-4-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500448979-93067-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

This patch reconstructs the whole driver to support per-lane
PHYs. Note that we could also support the legacy PHY if you
don't provide argument to our of_xlate.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
---

Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3:
- remove unnecessary forward declaration
- keep mutex inside struct rockchip_pcie_phy
- fix wrong check of args number
- move de-idle lanes after deasserting the reset

Changes in v2:
- deprecate legacy PHY model
- improve rockchip_pcie_phy_of_xlate
- fix wrong calculation of pwr_cnt and add new init_cnt
- add internal locking
- introduce per-lane data to simply the code

 drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index 6904633..b5005a5 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -73,10 +73,39 @@ struct rockchip_pcie_data {
 struct rockchip_pcie_phy {
 	struct rockchip_pcie_data *phy_data;
 	struct regmap *reg_base;
+	struct phy_pcie_instance {
+		struct phy *phy;
+		u32 index;
+	} phys[PHY_MAX_LANE_NUM];
+	struct mutex pcie_mutex;
 	struct reset_control *phy_rst;
 	struct clk *clk_pciephy_ref;
+	int pwr_cnt;
+	int init_cnt;
 };
 
+static inline
+struct rockchip_pcie_phy *to_pcie_phy(struct phy_pcie_instance *inst)
+{
+	return container_of(inst, struct rockchip_pcie_phy,
+					phys[inst->index]);
+}
+
+static struct phy *rockchip_pcie_phy_of_xlate(struct device *dev,
+					      struct of_phandle_args *args)
+{
+	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (args->args_count == 0)
+		return rk_phy->phys[0].phy;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(args->args[0] >= PHY_MAX_LANE_NUM))
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
+	return rk_phy->phys[args->args[0]].phy;
+}
+
+
 static inline void phy_wr_cfg(struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy,
 			      u32 addr, u32 data)
 {
@@ -116,29 +145,59 @@ static inline u32 phy_rd_cfg(struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy,
 
 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
 {
-	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst);
 	int err = 0;
 
+	mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+
+	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
+		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
+		     HIWORD_UPDATE(PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
+				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
+				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
+
+	if (--rk_phy->pwr_cnt)
+		goto err_out;
+
 	err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
-		return err;
+		goto err_restore;
 	}
 
+err_out:
+	mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
 	return 0;
+
+err_restore:
+	++rk_phy->pwr_cnt;
+	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
+		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
+		     HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
+				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
+				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
+	mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 {
-	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst);
 	int err = 0;
 	u32 status;
 	unsigned long timeout;
 
+	mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+
+	if (rk_phy->pwr_cnt++)
+		goto err_out;
+
 	err = reset_control_deassert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(&phy->dev, "deassert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
-		return err;
+		goto err_pwr_cnt;
 	}
 
 	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base, rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_conf,
@@ -146,6 +205,12 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 				   PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK,
 				   PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT));
 
+	regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
+		     rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_laneoff,
+		     HIWORD_UPDATE(!PHY_LANE_IDLE_OFF,
+				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_MASK,
+				   PHY_LANE_IDLE_A_SHIFT + inst->index));
+
 	/*
 	 * No documented timeout value for phy operation below,
 	 * so we make it large enough here. And we use loop-break
@@ -214,18 +279,29 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 		goto err_pll_lock;
 	}
 
+err_out:
+	mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
 	return 0;
 
 err_pll_lock:
 	reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
+err_pwr_cnt:
+	--rk_phy->pwr_cnt;
+	mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
 	return err;
 }
 
 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
 {
-	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst);
 	int err = 0;
 
+	mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+
+	if (rk_phy->init_cnt++)
+		goto err_out;
+
 	err = clk_prepare_enable(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(&phy->dev, "Fail to enable pcie ref clock.\n");
@@ -238,20 +314,33 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
 		goto err_reset;
 	}
 
-	return err;
+err_out:
+	mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+	return 0;
 
 err_reset:
+
 	clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
 err_refclk:
+	--rk_phy->init_cnt;
+	mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
 	return err;
 }
 
 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
 {
-	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst);
+
+	mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+
+	if (--rk_phy->init_cnt)
+		goto err_init_cnt;
 
 	clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
 
+err_init_cnt:
+	mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -283,10 +372,10 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy;
-	struct phy *generic_phy;
 	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
 	struct regmap *grf;
 	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
+	int i;
 
 	grf = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->parent->of_node);
 	if (IS_ERR(grf)) {
@@ -305,6 +394,8 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	rk_phy->phy_data = (struct rockchip_pcie_data *)of_id->data;
 	rk_phy->reg_base = grf;
 
+	mutex_init(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+
 	rk_phy->phy_rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "phy");
 	if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst)) {
 		if (PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
@@ -319,14 +410,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
 	}
 
-	generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, &ops);
-	if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
-		return PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
+	for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_LANE_NUM; i++) {
+		rk_phy->phys[i].phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, &ops);
+		if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->phys[i].phy)) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY%d\n", i);
+			return PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phys[i].phy);
+		}
+		rk_phy->phys[i].index = i;
+		phy_set_drvdata(rk_phy->phys[i].phy, &rk_phy->phys[i]);
 	}
 
-	phy_set_drvdata(generic_phy, rk_phy);
-	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rk_phy);
+	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev,
+					rockchip_pcie_phy_of_xlate);
 
 	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
 }
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-19  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-19  7:22 [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] Reconstruct rockchip's PCIe and PCIe-PHY driver for per-lane PHY model Shawn Lin
2017-07-19  7:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/7] PCI: rockchip: split out rockchip_pcie_get_phys Shawn Lin
2017-07-19  7:47   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2017-07-19  7:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] PCI: rockchip: introduce per-lanes PHYs support Shawn Lin
2017-07-19  7:48   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2017-07-19  7:22 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2017-07-19  7:50   ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/7] phy: rockcip-pcie: reconstruct driver to support per-lane PHYs Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2017-07-19  7:54     ` Shawn Lin
2017-07-19  8:08   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2017-07-19  9:36     ` Shawn Lin
2017-07-19  9:37       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2017-07-19  7:22 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] PCI: rockchip: idle the inactive PHY(s) Shawn Lin
2017-07-19  7:50   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2017-07-19  7:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: convert PCIe to use per-lane PHYs for rk3339 Shawn Lin
2017-07-19  7:27   ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/7] dt-bindings: PCI: rockchip: convert to use per-lane PHY model Shawn Lin
2017-07-19  7:27   ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/7] dt-bindings: phy: convert to use per-lane Rockchip PCIe PHY Shawn Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1500448979-93067-4-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).