From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>, kishon@ti.com
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: dra7xx: Print link state to console for debug
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 23:35:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508222128.6530.22.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508219031-25592-1-git-send-email-faiz_abbas@ti.com>
On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:13 +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Enable support for printing the LTSSM link state for debugging PCI
> when link is down.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> index 34427a6..7b150b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,18 @@ struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data {
>
> #define to_dra7xx_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
>
> +static char state[][20] = {
> + "DETECT_QUIET", "DETECT_ACT", "POLL_ACTIVE", "POLL_COMPLIANCE",
> + "POLL_CONFIG", "PRE_DETECT_QUIET", "DETECT_WAIT", "CFG_LINKWD_START",
> + "CFG_LINKWD_ACEPT", "CFG_LANENUM_WAIT", "CFG_LANENUM_ACEPT",
> + "CFG_COMPLETE", "CFG_IDLE", "RCVRY_LOCK", "RCVRY_SPEED",
> + "RCVRY_RCVRCFG", "RCVRY_IDLE", "L0", "L0S", "L123_SEND_EIDLE",
> + "L1_IDLE", "L2_IDLE", "L2_WAKE", "DISABLED_ENTRY", "DISABLED_IDLE",
> + "DISABLED", "LPBK_ENTRY", "LPBK_ACTIVE", "LPBK_EXIT",
> + "LPBK_EXIT_TIMEOUT", "HOT_RESET_ENTRY", "HOT_RESET", "RCVRY_EQ0",
> + "RCVRY_EQ1", "RCVRY_EQ2", "RCVRY_EQ3"
what's wrong with using the far more typical
static const char *link_state[] = {
"DETECT_QUIET",
...
};
> +};
> +
> static inline u32 dra7xx_pcie_readl(struct dra7xx_pcie *pcie, u32 offset)
> {
> return readl(pcie->base + offset);
> @@ -118,6 +130,15 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> {
> struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx = to_dra7xx_pcie(pci);
> u32 reg = dra7xx_pcie_readl(dra7xx, PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_PHY_CS);
> + u32 cmd_reg;
> + u32 ltssm_state;
> +
> + if (!(reg & LINK_UP)) {
> + cmd_reg = dra7xx_pcie_readl(dra7xx,
> + PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_DEVICE_CMD);
> + ltssm_state = (cmd_reg & GENMASK(7, 2)) >> 2;
> + dev_err(pci->dev, "Link state:%s\n", state[ltssm_state]);
and why is this a dev_err and not dev_info?
and if it's really for debugging, why not dev_dbg?
> + }
>
> return !!(reg & LINK_UP);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 5:43 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: dra7xx: Print link state to console for debug Faiz Abbas
2017-10-17 6:35 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-10-17 14:45 ` David Laight
2017-10-19 13:23 ` Faiz Abbas
2017-10-18 6:16 ` Faiz Abbas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508222128.6530.22.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).