From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Message-ID: <1513680330.7000.167.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 14/26] pch_gbe: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot() From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sinan Kaya , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:45:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1513661883-28662-15-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> References: <1513661883-28662-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1513661883-28662-15-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kees Cook , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, open list , Eric Dumazet , "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , Tobias Klauser , "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+bjorn=helgaas.com@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 00:37 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as > where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be > reused for other domain numbers. > > Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). > Where this idea come from? pci_get_bus_and_slot() still might be useful for the wired devices in SoC where we know for sure that domain == 0. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel