From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Message-ID: <1513689898.7000.191.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 14/26] pch_gbe: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot() From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sinan Kaya , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:24:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1513661883-28662-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1513661883-28662-15-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1513680330.7000.167.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kees Cook , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, open list , Eric Dumazet , "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , Tobias Klauser , "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+bjorn=helgaas.com@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 07:17 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 12/19/2017 5:45 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 00:37 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > > > > pci_get_bus_and_slot() still might be useful for the wired devices > > in > > SoC where we know for sure that domain == 0. > > > > Then hard code the domain number as 0 while calling > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() > if you know for sure that this device will never work on a non-zero > domain. Thanks for so detailed explanation. Okay, I suppose you did estimate the amount of drivers / modules that may look better with pci_get_bus_and_slot() and the result is comparable small. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel